mashable-rss

“The Daily Show” host Ronnie Chieng broke down the Democrats’ decision to brand Trump and Vance as “weird”.

“The Daily Show” host Ronnie Chieng broke down the Democrats’ decision to brand Trump and Vance as “weird”.

Read More 

While we’re waiting for the Season 2 finale of “House of the Dragon,” why not take a tour through Driftmark with Clinton Liberty?

While we’re waiting for the Season 2 finale of “House of the Dragon,” why not take a tour through Driftmark with Clinton Liberty?

Read More 

“Shelby Oaks,” the first film from YouTube reviewer Chris Stuckmann, includes influences ranging from “The Blair Witch Project” to “Barbarian.”

Can a great horror movie be Frankensteined together from a laundry list of iconic ones? That’s what I’m left pondering after watching Shelby Oaks, the promising and oft unnerving but also somewhat scattered first feature from popular YouTube movie reviewer Chris Stuckmann.

The movie starts out convincing you it’s one thing, but reveals itself in quick succession to be a very different beast altogether. From The Blair Witch Project to Martyrs to Barbarian and several beyond that, Shelby Oaks doesn’t just wear its many genre influences on its sleeves — it wears them on its chest and back and shoulders. It’s a coat of many horror movies, made of cuts deep and broad. And, to ever so slightly belabor the metaphor, some of the coat fits just right, while as much of it could use some more refined tailoring. 

Still, as far as Kickstarter-funded first features go, Shelby Oaks is a big, bold swing — albeit one produced by horror honcho Mike Flanagan, the man behind a swath of Netflix horror miniseries like The Haunting of Hill House and The Fall of the House of Usher. It’s twisty as hell, bears some ace performances, and truly gifts audiences with some very sticky and very spooky images. Most of all, it marks the emergence of a horror filmmaker worth keeping an eye on. 

Shelby Oaks blends The Blair Witch Project with Lake Mungo — and that’s just the start.

“Who took Riley Brennan?” is the question at the heart of Shelby Oaks. The film opens with the last known bit of footage of Riley Brennan (Sarah Durn), YouTuber/ghost hunter, before she went missing in the titular town. In the scene, she sits on a bed in a cabin in the middle of the woods. She’s seen sobbing, absolutely terrified, saying into the camera, “I’m so scared.”

It’s an inch-long leap from Riley’s tearful lament to Heather Donahue’s legendarily snotty apologia in The Blair Witch Project, the one that poetically stated, “I’m scared to close my eyes, and I’m scared to open them.”

Writer-director Stuckmann anticipates his horror-loving audience will make this connection. But then he does something really interesting, pivoting from the found-footage conceit to a true-crime documentary framework. Leaping to a decade or so after Riley’s disappearance, it turns out that Riley’s older sister, Mia (Camille Sullivan), has spent the intervening years fruitlessly searching for the truth of what happened in the woods of Shelby Oaks that night. And she’s now starring in a true-crime documentary in an effort to reignite interest in the case of her missing sister.  

For horror fanatics, this turn might well recall Lake Mungo. Told via talking-head interviews with the family of the missing blonde girl at its center, the 2008 Australian horror film unfurls its paranormal revelations piecemeal through conversations and scattered bits of phone video. Lake Mungo is admittedly a deeper cut than The Blair Witch Project, but no sooner does Shelby Oaks settle into this faux-documentary conceit than Stuckmann pivots again to a straightforward narrative film. Well, it’s as straightforward as the twisty likes of Hereditary or Barbarian.

Essentially, Shelby Oaks maintains its cast, but ditches the documentary framework altogether, showing us what is “really” happening — but through artifice, forcing us to question what is real. The camerawork becomes stylized, with special effects and slow motion and close-ups; an aggressive and manipulative score takes over. The film will shift from these narrative scenes to the documentary setup to found footage and back again, maximizing this sense of narrative disquiet.  

These structural sleights of hands, like all good and proper rug-pullings, are where Shelby Oaks works its greatest magic. Playing on the expectations of horror diehards, Stuckmann manages to keep us on our toes, even discombobulated. We find ourselves switching between missing-person found footage to the cult horror of Hereditary with the twists and turns (and hidden underground caverns) of Martyrs and Barbarian, and then right back to a talking-head true-crime doc on a dime. This all builds up its own sort of disassociation within the experience of watching it. 

Shelby Oaks is a hodgepodge of horror, from found footage to Satanic panic.

Despite these daring shifts, Shelby Oaks begins to feel more like the parts of its sum and not vice versa. Stuckmann is motioning toward all of these other movies to unmoor us, but those references often distract from the actual plot and, in turn, undermine our investment in it. For instance, the casting of Brendan Sexton III as Mia’s husband proves distracting, even though he’s terrific. An actor who’s been killing it since Todd Solondz’s 1995 hit, Welcome to the Dollhouse, Sexton turns in yet another lovely, sad piece of work here. But you set him against multiple scenes that take place inside of a haunted prison, and now all I’m thinking about is Session 9, Brad Anderson’s fantastically creepy 2001 haunted prison movie, where Sexton made a mark as one of the asbestos cleaners who found himself on the wrong end of some rusty psychiatric equipment.

To what end is this? At what point do these Easter eggs overwhelm? All these allusions ultimately get in the way of Shelby Oaks standing on its own and becoming truly, deeply scary. Stuckmann seems very aware of the exact moment when his scares are supposed to land, often to the point of self-consciousness. You could set a timer to when the thing you’re supposed to be dreading will appear, and the dreaded thing will stick that mark every time. There are moments when a zag would’ve kicked the ass of a zig, but Stuckmann keeps on zigging, playing right into horror connoisseur expectations. There is real, earned tension, but the film keeps deflating itself despite the fun of its reality-shifting and the many excellent go-for-broke performances therein. 

Camille Sullivan leads a cast that fights valiantly for Shelby Oaks. 

An actor who’s been nipping at the edges of recognition for two decades, appearing in TV shows from Dark Angel to The Man in the High Castle, Camille Sullivan has long proven a reliable performer. And here at last she is given the spotlight to make the most of it. 

Even when Mia starts doing incredibly stupid things that put her right in harm’s way, Sullivan is genuinely devastating. She sells the hell out of bad choices, making it clear that Mia’s a person who would go to any lengths to uncover what happened to her beloved sister. (And as long as we’re talking references, besides this being the lead’s arc in that French Extremity classic Martyrs, it’s straight out of the terrifying 1988 Dutch thriller The Vanishing, too.) 

Sullivan nails big action moments, like emotional blowups and freak-outs in which her palpable fright is legitimately difficult to look at. But even the small moments give her opportunities to send shivers. Just watch the way the flashlight trembles in her hand as she investigates that haunted prison, a subtle shift in body language that communicates a bone-deep terror. It’s those touches that carry the audience alongside Mia the entire way. 

Sarah Durn is also haunting as missing girl Riley, who has to sell her undoing while staring off into space during the “naturalistic” found-footage portions of this movie. These are scenes we keep coming back to to see more of as, natch, more footage gets found, and her haunted presence diffuses into every corner of the film. As we know from decades of subpar found-footage movies, it’s not easy, this high-wire balancing act of giving a relaxed and unprofessional-seeming performance under those constraints. Loads have failed spectacularly. But Durn makes us understand why her sister won’t let her go even as everyone else has long given up. She makes Riley our ghost, too.

The whole ensemble expertly submerges into the multiple realities of this story. Even if Stuckmann needs to get a little bit out of his own way in some other areas, he proves to be terrific with his performers. Sullivan and Sexton share some very moving moments together as they watch their marriage crumble in the face of tragedy. Michael Beach wears a bone-deep exhaustion in his performance as the main detective on the case, giving a lived-in sense of resignation at the system’s endless failures. And Keith David (the deep-voiced legend from The Thing and They Live, among many) shows up to Keith David it out of the park, playing the former warden of that haunted prison who has seen some shit and who, in typical fashion, is going to colorfully monologue to you all about it. 

But best of all is the great and notoriously underused Robin Bartlett. One of those stalwart character actors with decades of stealing scenes under their belts (she’s been doing it since Heaven’s Gate in 1980, but I always first think of her hilarious scenes around the dinner table in Inside Llewyn Davis whenever I see her), Bartlett shows up and gives the movie a last-act goose that takes it over the edge into true unhinged horror-movie delight. More I cannot and will not spoil, except to say that yes, this is how you give Robin Bartlett her due. She ends up stealing — and in so doing, making — the entire movie.

Playing like a post-post-modern pastiche, an ouroboros of antecedents, and sometimes just a wicked walk through a nightmare wasteland, Shelby Oaks has enough gas in its tank for 10 movies. That it sometimes feels like 10 movies we’ve seen before is both part of its weird ballsy charm and its scrappy undoing. In the end, Shelby Oaks is a battle between Stuckmann’s many, many inspirations. But the gripping performances and big swings in style make for a movie worth its runtime. Despite its faults, the directorial debut should prove a hell of a calling card for Chris Stuckmann as a new voice in horror. I can’t wait to see what he delivers to us next.

Shelby Oaks was reviewed out of the Fantasia International Film Festival.

Read More 

Our true-crime obsessed critic is seriously shook.

Netflix has invested big in true crime. The streaming service not only boasts such popular documentaries as Making a Murderer, The Keepers, and Amanda Knox, but also gripping drama series based on real crimes, like The Watcher, When They See Us, and Mindhunter. So, it seemed a natural fit for Netflix to resurrect Unsolved Mysteries in 2020, even if it meant a radical reimagining. 

While the series continues to cover everything from suspicious deaths to missing persons cases to paranormal activity, the rebooted Unsolved Mysteries ditched the anthology format. Instead of a series of segments about various mysteries, each episode focuses on one case. Gone too is the ominous yet resolute voiceover of the late Robert Stack, and it is sorely missed. Rewatching the episodes of the classic series, you can see how even the grimmest cases offered a moment of hope. As the segment concluded, you’d hold your breath waiting for Stack’s husky timber to say firmly: “Update.” Then, a racing synth score would play, laying out how the case has moved forward or even been solved.

With Stack having passed over 20 years ago, this wouldn’t be the case even if Netflix’s version solved the mysteries. (While Netflix’s relaunch has led to some updates, they are typically announced over social media.) Still, never have I yearned for Stack’s gruff but urgent “Update” more than at the conclusion of Unsolved Mysteries Volume 4, episode 2, “Body in the Basement.” 

Before you dive into Netflix’s latest offering of true crime tales, take this as a warning: Do not watch this alone. 

In “Body in the Basement,” Unsolved Mysteries explores the case of Amanda Antoni’s suspicious death. 

Volume 1 began with this unsettling subset of Unsolved Mysteries, focusing on the bizarre demise of Rey Rivera, a beloved husband who raced out the door in flip-flops never to come home. He’d be found days later, fallen through the broken roof of a historic high-rise hotel. But the police’s insistence that it was suicide didn’t satisfy family and friends who pointed to various clues that just didn’t add up. Did he fall or was he pushed? A similar and similarly troubling question arises in the fourth, and latest, volume of the series, with “Body in the Basement.”

Directed by Gabe Torres, the second episode of Volume 4 begins like many a true-crime documentary, with the playing of a frantic 911 call. “There’s so much blood.” weeps the caller, Lee Antoni, who is detailing the scene he came home to after a weekend away from his wife, Amanda. Interviews with her brothers will set up who she was through warm memories and family photos. Then, they begin to paint a picture of Lee.

As her spouse, he’s naturally the police’s first suspect after she’s found dead in the basement of their house. But swiftly, the police and this episode move on from Lee as a suspect and instead regard him as a resource, as it seems he was on the phone with her when disaster struck. What made their pet Labrador, Ruby, bark in apparent alarm? Why did Amanda’s call get abruptly cut off?

Was it a break-in? A murder? An accident? These are the possibilities that still haunt Amanda’s loved ones. What forensics offer is that Amanda’s head was cut open, causing her to bleed profusely and fatally as, over hours, she walked around the basement but didn’t leave to seek aid. Her bare footsteps in the blood tell us this much. But how did her head come to be cut? Why didn’t she leave the basement? And why — over the day and half that she was in the basement before discovery — did neither her dog or cat come down, disturbing the blood with their paw prints? 

As a detective stands at the base of the stairs where Amanda’s blood footprints stopped, the audience is left to wonder about these questions with no promise of resolution. Worse yet, we’re left to wonder what to even root for, as all possibilities are bone-chilling. 

I beg you: Do not watch this Unsolved Mysteries episode alone. 

I watch a lot of true crime, both for work and because I can’t stop. “Body in the Basement” was the episode I turned on before my work day began. But it stopped me cold. I was unfit for morning chitchat. Coffee couldn’t shake the shivers from my legs. Even now, thinking back on Amanda’s story, my eyes sting, threatening tears, and my legs are covered in goosebumps. This episode didn’t show footage of her remains at the scene. But it did show the blood, so much blood, that surrounded where her body laid before being removed by police. Worse still, it showed those footprints that sketch a story we cannot (yet?) understand. 

I can’t wrench loose the vivid image in my head of Amanda walking around her basement, bleeding, her loyal Labrador just up the stairs with no door to separate them, yet keeping her distance. What were those hours like for Amanda? And do I really want to know? All the speculation I can offer is fueled by fear, and none of it gives me solace. 

Volume 4 delves into five new mysteries, among them a summary of the crimes of Jack the Ripper; the cold case of Sigrid Stevenson, who was murdered on the college stage on which she loved to perform; the curious incident of an embalmed head being found in Pennsylvania; and a look into the American cryptid most beloved by internet culture, the Mothman.

These stories are in turn shocking, sad, and maybe even at times outrageous. (The expert who points to the blue heron as a possible cause for Mothman hysteria is pretty amusing in his barely restrained cynicism about the cryptid’s existence.) Yet nothing hits as hard as the mystery of Amanda Antoni. It’s been days since I first learned her story, saw her home, heard her brothers’ praise and saw her husband’s tears. And I wish I had something profound to say about her or their loss. I wish I had something to offer beyond a warning. 

Some true crime stories serve as cautionary tales. Some sing of justice, however long delayed. Some warn of the fatal flaws in our society. Some will break your heart to pieces. And some scar your psyche, cutting deep to the very root of fear and existential dread. “Body in the Basement” is the last two.

So brace yourself before hitting play. If you dare at all. 

Unsolved Mysteries Volume 4 premieres on Netflix Aug. 31.

Read More 

Answers to each clue for the July 31, 2024 edition of NYT’s The Mini crossword puzzle.

The Mini is a bite-sized version of The New York Times‘ revered daily crossword. While the crossword is a lengthier experience that requires both knowledge and patience to complete, The Mini is an entirely different vibe.

With only a handful of clues to answer, the daily puzzle doubles as a speed-running test for many who play it.

So, when a tricky clue disrupts a player’s flow, it can be frustrating! If you find yourself stumped playing The Mini — much like with Wordle and Connections — we have you covered.

Here are the clues and answers to NYT’s The Mini for Tuesday, July 31, 2024:

Across

Keyboard key near the top left

The answer is tab.

Hot couple, in a celebrity gossip column

The answer is item.

Wild, as an animal

The answer is feral.

Like many four-legged friends

The answer is furry.

Keyboard key on the bottom

The answer is space.

Down

Little spats

The answer is tiffs.

Thoroughly devoured

The answer is ateup.

Yogi who said “Always go to other people’s funerals, otherwise they won’t come to yours”

The answer is Berra.

Comedian Maron

The answer is Marc.

Caustic chemical compound

The answer is lye.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

Read More 

The NYT Strands hints and answers you need to make the most of your puzzling experience.

If you’re reading this, you’re looking for a little help playing Strands, the New York Times‘ elevated word-search game.

By providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.

If you’re feeling stuck or just don’t have 10 or more minutes to figure out today’s puzzle, we’ve got all the NYT Strands hints for today’s puzzle you need to progress at your preferred pace.

NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: Staying power

The hint for the theme is that these words are binding

Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explained

The answers are different types of sticky materials.

NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?

Today’s NYT Strands spangram is horizontal.

NYT Strands spangram answer today

Today’s spangram is StickyStuff.

NYT Strands word list for July 31

Glue

Epoxy

Adhesive

StickyStuff

Bubblegum

Tape

Caramel

Looking for other daily online games? Find one you might like – or hints for another game you’re already playing – on Mashable’s Games page.

Read More 

Live stream the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 online for free from anywhere in the world.

TL;DR: Live stream the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 for free on BBC iPlayer. Access this free streaming platform from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

If you’re looking to watch athletes run at seriously impressive speeds during Paris 2024, the women’s 200m final promises to have excitement and drama in abundance.

The gold medallist from Tokyo 2020, Jamaican runner Elaine Thompson-Herah, is out injured, which means we’re guaranteed to get a new champion. Fellow Jamaican runner Shericka Jackson is the favorite, having run the second fastest time ever in the 200m last year. But it’s not a foregone conclusion. Jackson could find strong competition from U.S. runner Gabby Thomas and Great Britain’s Dina Asher-Smith.

If you want to watch the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024?

The women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 takes place at 3:40 p.m. ET on Aug. 6. The event is hosted by the Stade de France.

How to watch the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 for free

The women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 is available to live stream for free on BBC iPlayer.

BBC iPlayer is geo-restricted to the UK, but you can access this free streaming site from anywhere in the world by signing up to a VPN. A VPN can disguise your real IP address (digital location) while connecting you to a secure server in the UK, which will help you unblock free streaming platforms such as BBC iPlayer no matter where you’re based around the globe.

Unblock BBC iPlayer for free by following this simple process:

Sign up for a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

Open up the app and connect to a server in the UK

Visit BBC iPlayer

Live stream the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 from anywhere in the world

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer deals such as free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. Take advantage of these offers to unblock BBC iPlayer, and without parting with any cash in the long-run. This will give you time to stream the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 (plus all the events that follow) before recovering any investment.

What is the best VPN for BBC iPlayer?

ExpressVPN is the best service for streaming live sport on BBC iPlayer, for a number of reasons:

Servers in 105 countries including the UK

Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure

Fast connection speeds free from throttling

Up to eight simultaneous connections

30-day money-back guarantee

A one-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $99.95 and includes an extra three months for free. That’s an impressive 49% off for a limited time. For that price you’ll also get a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee.

Live stream the women’s 200m final at Paris 2024 for free with ExpressVPN.

Read More 

Live stream USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 online for free from anywhere in the world.

TL;DR: Live stream USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 for free on BBC iPlayer. Access this free streaming platform from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

Team USA are expected to win basketball gold at Paris 2024, which is a lot of weight on the shoulders of those players. But we’re talking about the likes of Lebron James, Kevin Durant, and Steph Curry here, so they’re not exactly new to pressure.

Next up for team USA is South Sudan. These sides met recently in a warm-up fixture that almost ended in a stunning win for South Sudan. Could they secure a shocking win this time around, or will USA show their class?

If you want to watch USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024?

USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 takes place at 3 p.m. ET on July 31.

How to watch USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 for free

USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 is available to live stream for free on BBC iPlayer.

BBC iPlayer is geo-restricted to the UK, but anyone can access this free streaming service with a VPN. These are tools that hide your real IP address and connect you to a secure server in the UK, meaning you can unblock free streaming sites like BBC iPlayer from anywhere in the world.

Unblock BBC iPlayer for free by following this simple process:

Sign up for a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

Open up the app and connect to a server in the UK

Visit BBC iPlayer

Live stream USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 from anywhere in the world

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but leading VPNs do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can unblock BBC iPlayer without committing with your cash. This is obviously not a long-term solution, but it gives you time to stream USA vs. South Sudan (plus the rest of Paris 2024) before recovering your investment.

What is the best VPN for BBC iPlayer?

ExpressVPN is the best service for streaming live sport on BBC iPlayer, for a number of reasons:

Servers in 105 countries including the UK

Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure

Fast connection speeds free from throttling

Up to eight simultaneous connections

30-day money-back guarantee

A one-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $99.95 and includes an extra three months for free — 49% off for a limited time. This plan also includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee.

Live stream USA vs. South Sudan at Paris 2024 for free with ExpressVPN.

Read More 

Here’s the answer for “Wordle” #1138 on July 31, as well as a few hints, tips, and clues to help you solve it yourself.

Oh hey there! If you’re here, it must be time for Wordle. As always, we’re serving up our daily hints and tips to help you figure out today’s answer.

If you just want to be told today’s word, you can jump to the bottom of this article for July 31’s Wordle solution revealed. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

Where did Wordle come from?

Originally created by engineer Josh Wardle as a gift for his partner, Wordle rapidly spread to become an international phenomenon, with thousands of people around the globe playing every day. Alternate Wordle versions created by fans also sprang up, including battle royale Squabble, music identification game Heardle, and variations like Dordle and Quordle that make you guess multiple words at once. 

Wordle eventually became so popular that it was purchased by the New York Times, and TikTok creators even livestream themselves playing.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Wordle.

What’s the best Wordle starting word?

The best Wordle starting word is the one that speaks to you. But if you prefer to be strategic in your approach, we have a few ideas to help you pick a word that might help you find the solution faster. One tip is to select a word that includes at least two different vowels, plus some common consonants like S, T, R, or N.

What happened to the Wordle archive?

The entire archive of past Wordle puzzles used to be available for anyone to enjoy whenever they felt like it. Unfortunately, it has since been taken down, with the website’s creator stating it was done at the request of the New York Times.

Is Wordle getting harder?

It might feel like Wordle is getting harder, but it actually isn’t any more difficult than when it first began. You can turn on Wordle‘s Hard Mode if you’re after more of a challenge, though.

Here’s a subtle hint for today’s Wordle answer:

Pasta.

Does today’s Wordle answer have a double letter?

The letter N appears twice.

Today’s Wordle is a 5-letter word that starts with…

Today’s Wordle starts with the letter P.

The Wordle answer today is…

Get your last guesses in now, because it’s your final chance to solve today’s Wordle before we reveal the solution.

Drumroll please!

The solution to today’s Wordle is…

PENNE.

Don’t feel down if you didn’t manage to guess it this time. There will be a new Wordle for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we’ll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

Reporting by Caitlin Welsh, Sam Haysom, Amanda Yeo, Shannon Connellan, Cecily Mauran, Mike Pearl, and Adam Rosenberg contributed to this article.

Read More 

Connections is a New York Times word game that’s all about finding the “common threads between words.” How to solve the puzzle.

Connections is the latest New York Times word game that’s captured the public’s attention. The game is all about finding the “common threads between words.” And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we’ve served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today’s puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for July 31’s Connections solution. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

What is Connections?

The NYT‘s latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications’ Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Tweet may have been deleted

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there’s only one correct answer. If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Tweet may have been deleted

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

Here’s a hint for today’s Connections categories

Want a hit about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

Yellow: Throaty

Green: Pointy appendages

Blue: Varieties of traditional beer

Purple: French things

Here are today’s Connections categories

Need a little extra help? Today’s connections fall into the following categories:

Yellow: Rapsy

Green: Fingers

Blue: Ale Styles

Purple: French___

Looking for Wordle today? Here’s the answer to today’s Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today’s puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today’s Connections #416 is…

What is the answer to Connections today

Raspy: GRUFF, HOARSE, HUSKY, ROUGH

Fingers: LITTLE, MIDDLE, POINTER, RING

Ale Styles: AMBER, PORTER, SOUR, STOUT

French___: BULLDOG, FRY, HORN, KISS

Don’t feel down if you didn’t manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we’ll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Is this not the Connections game you were looking for? Here are the hints and answers to yesterday’s Connections.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

Read More