mashable-rss

Hints and answers to today’s Hurdle all in one place.

If you like playing daily word games like Wordle, then Hurdle is a great game to add to your routine.

There are five rounds to the game. The first round sees you trying to guess the word, with correct, misplaced, and incorrect letters shown in each guess. If you guess the correct answer, it’ll take you to the next hurdle, providing the answer to the last hurdle as your first guess. This can give you several clues or none, depending on the words. For the final hurdle, every correct answer from previous hurdles is shown, with correct and misplaced letters clearly shown.

An important note is that the number of times a letter is highlighted from previous guesses does necessarily indicate the number of times that letter appears in the final hurdle.

If you find yourself stuck at any step of today’s Hurdle, don’t worry! We have you covered.

Hurdle Word 1 hint

Sketchy.

Hurdle Word 1 answer

DICEY

Hurdle Word 2 hint

Clever in a funny way.

Hurdle Word 2 Answer

WITTY

Hurdle Word 3 hint

Up to.

Hurdle Word 3 answer

UNTIL

Hurdle Word 4 hint

A cause of muscle pain.

Hurdle Word 4 answer

CRAMP

Final Hurdle hint

To legally take in a child to raise.

Hurdle Word 5 answer

ADOPT

If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Read More 

Connections: Sports Edition is a New York Times word game about finding common sports threads between words. How to solve the puzzle.

Connections: Sports Edition is a new version of the popular New York Times word game that seeks to test the knowledge of sports fans.

Like the original Connections, the game is all about finding the “common threads between words.” And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we’ve served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today’s puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for October 28’s Connections solution. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

What is Connections Sports Edition?

The NYT‘s latest daily word game has launched in association with The Athletic, the New York Times property that provides the publication’s sports coverage. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Tweet may have been deleted

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there’s only one correct answer.

If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Tweet may have been deleted

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

Here’s a hint for today’s Connections Sports Edition categories

Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

Yellow: Where to line up

Green: Pitching success

Blue: BOOMSHAKALAKA

Purple: Playing field for armchair quarterbacks

Here are today’s Connections Sports Edition categories

Need a little extra help? Today’s connections fall into the following categories:

Yellow – Football positions

Green – Strikeout

Blue – Slang for dunk

Purple – NFL video games

Looking for Wordle today? Here’s the answer to today’s Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today’s puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today’s Connections Sports Edition #39 is…

What is the answer to Connections Sports Edition today

Football positions: CB, P, TE, WR

Strikeout: K, PUNCHOUT, SO, WHIFF

Slang for dunk: HAMMER, JAM, SLAM, STUFF

NFL video games: 2K, BLITZ, FEVER, STREET

Don’t feel down if you didn’t manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we’ll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Connections.

Read More 

Olivia Rodrigo surprised trick-or-treaters on Halloween for a fun segment on “Jimmy Kimmel Live”.

Olivia Rodrigo surprised trick-or-treaters on Halloween for a fun segment on “Jimmy Kimmel Live”.

Read More 

Answers to each clue for the November 1, 2024 edition of NYT’s The Mini crossword puzzle.

The Mini is a bite-sized version of The New York Times‘ revered daily crossword. While the crossword is a lengthier experience that requires both knowledge and patience to complete, The Mini is an entirely different vibe.

With only a handful of clues to answer, the daily puzzle doubles as a speed-running test for many who play it.

So, when a tricky clue disrupts a player’s flow, it can be frustrating! If you find yourself stumped playing The Mini — much like with Wordle and Connections — we have you covered.

Here are the clues and answers to NYT’s The Mini for Friday, November 1, 2024:

Across

With 5-Down, rhyming Japanese philosophy of finding beauty in imperfection

The answer is Wabi.

Sneaker bottoms

The answer is Soles.

Typeface similar to Helvetica

The answer is Arial.

Piece of grass

The answer is Blade.

Personal items checked by bouncers

The answer is IDs.

Down

Disney ___

The answer is World.

Pen name

The answer is Alias.

Pearl in a pearl necklace, e.g.

The answer is Bead.

Bit of land in the ocean

The answer is Isle.

See 1-Across

The answer is Sabi.

If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Mini Crossword.

Read More 

‘Life is Strange: Double Exposure’ is a direct sequel to the first game that continues Max’s personal growth while providing a solid cast of new characters. However, its pacing feels rushed towards the latter half of the game and its gameplay mechanics aren’t as interesting as previous entries.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is the latest entry in the Life is Strange series — it’s a direct follow-up to the original game that came out in 2015.

The game expertly showcases the original protagonist, Max, and her personal growth, while introducing a likable cast of new supporting characters. The story starts off incredibly strong, but the pacing feels rushed towards the end and the conclusion may not satisfy some players. Additionally, the gameplay mechanics feel a bit underwhelming.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure plot

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is set 10 years after the original game, with Max Caulfield returning as a photographer for Caledon University.

Due to the events of the previous game, Caulfield no longer uses her time-rewinding powers. However, after her friend Safi is mysteriously murdered by a gunshot, she develops new powers that allow her to switch between timelines. Max alternates between her original timeline and another where Safi was never shot and utilizes clues from both to find out who killed Safi.

It’s an incredibly strong foundation and the mystery surrounding Safi’s death is a real page turner up until the last few chapters, which felt rushed and the ending was a bit unsatisfying. Without spoiling anything, the first three chapters kept my attention, but when all of the details started coming together, I couldn’t help but feel like the idea of Safi’s death was a sort of bait and switch.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure characters

Life is Strange: Double Exposure’s cast is quite small, which lets other supporting characters get their time to shine.

For example, Max can see both versions of Safi’s best friend, Moses, when switching between the two timelines and how he reacts to certain events. This allows players to experience different facets and emotions of these characters, creating fully realized personalities.

Max shows strong character growth, too, learning from her actions 10 years ago during the events of the original game. She wants to avoid a repeat of what happened before, when her own selfish motives led to innocent people getting hurt. This is demonstrated throughout the game with her words and actions.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure mechanics

Shifting between timelines sounds like a really interesting gameplay mechanic on paper, but it feels underutilized in Life is Strange: Double Exposure.

In the game, Max shifts timelines to complete simple tasks, like entering a room that’s locked in one reality but open in another. It doesn’t really get too much deeper than that. There was one scene where Max had to save a person from falling into a frozen lake as it was cracking, so she shifted the crumbling bed of ice with the other timeline’s undisturbed one. 

It was a very cool implementation of Max’s new powers, but those possibilities were only shown through cutscenes and not actual gameplay. I feel like the developers could’ve come up with some more different ideas to incorporate Max’s powers with gameplay.

Throughout the game, you’ll be presented with different choices and dialogue options on how to proceed. Some are more impactful than others. For example, Max finds out a character is planning on filing a restraining order on Safi, and she has the option to tell Safi about it. Whether the player chooses to tell Safi about it has ramifications during later chapters. This adds significant replayability to each playthrough, allowing you to experience different outcomes.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure graphics

The graphics in Life is Strange: Double Exposure are great, especially its art direction.

It has a cartoon-ish look that avoids looking juvenile, and the facial expressions are the best the series has seen thus far. It’s vibrant with colors, and the contrast between the two timelines reflects the mood of each one. In the one where Safi is still alive, there’s a warm yellow hue to it, while the one where she’s dead has a somber blue coloration. It’s a simple yet effective technique that can affect the mood.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure music and audio

The music and audio in Life is Strange: Double Exposure is good, but it wasn’t something that I paid particular attention to throughout the game. However, the game uses some licensed music from real-world artists like Tessa Rose Jackson & Feel for songs like “Wake,” “Illusion,” and “So This Is Lonely,” which stand out in the soundtrack.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure difficulty

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a narrative adventure game, so it doesn’t have any difficulty options.

However, there are plenty of good accessibility options, such as softening the white bloom that occurs when shifting timeline, making the gameplay experience smoother.

Life is Strange: Double Exposure performance

Life is Strange: Double Exposure performed well on Xbox Series X. There were no hard crashes nor performance issues — and load times were reasonable. However, there were some issues with textures popping in when cutscenes were loading in, making for some weird visual glitches.

Is Life is Strange: Double Exposure worth it?

Life is Strange: Double Exposure is a worthy follow-up for those who enjoyed Max’s original adventure. Without giving away spoilers, the game hints at future sequels, which occasionally undermines its story potential. This focus detracts from Double Exposure’s impact, leading to a somewhat underwhelming ending.

However, Max’s personal growth felt satisfying and the cast is likable. While the gameplay mechanics involving Max’s time powers could’ve been more fleshed out, the story was enough to keep my attention until the end. At $50, Life is Strange: Double Exposure is worth it for die-hard Life is Strange fans, but casual players can wait for a discount.

Read More 

“Juror #2” is masterful Hollywood throwback courtesy of director Clint Eastwood. Review.

Juror #2 sets an incredibly high bar for itself, as a movie that lives in the shadow of 12 Angry Men. However, its struggles to differentiate itself from the Sidney Lumet classic yield intriguing contradictions. This is an appropriate outcome for a film so torn over notions of American justice, with which it wrestles by imbuing a familiar plot with a significant wrinkle: What if one of the 12 jurors realizes they might be responsible for the murder at hand?

Despite its growing pains, Juror #2 gradually grows more gripping and self-assured, taking the form of solid, mid-budget adult entertainment with a lot on its mind and heart — the kind of movie Hollywood seldom green-lights in 2024. If it really is the last thing Clint Eastwood ever directs (he is, after all, 94 years old), then it’s one hell of a swan song, despite Warner Bros.’ insistence on a paltry 50-screen release.

With its sense of careful, classical composition and emphasis on performance, Eastwood’s courtroom drama represents a kind of American filmmaking being left in the past, which is oddly fitting too. The past is where the movie’s subconscious resides, both as a tale of festering guilt and as a work that gazes lovingly upward at lofty American ideals that may no longer exist. Juror #2 reveals cracks in its own nostalgia through its riveting drama, and even through its own political flaws.

What is Juror #2 about?

On the surface, Georgia magazine writer Justin Kemp (Nicholas Hoult) seems to have it all, from the white picket fence to a doting, pregnant wife, Allison Crewson (Zoey Deutch). Their dynamic is fun and easygoing, and they even spend Halloween dressed up as the subjects of Grant Wood’s painting American Gothic, an idyllic piece of Americana. Their only seeming speedbump en route to parenthood is the minor inconvenience of Justin’s jury duty summons. The trial in question offers a stark contrast to Justin and Allison’s picturesque domestic bliss: A tattooed drug pusher, James Sythe (Gabriel Basso) — the character’s name evokes the grim reaper — is accused of bludgeoning his girlfriend, Kendall Carter (Francesca Eastwood), to death, and tossing her corpse off a shallow bridge.

The crime scene photos are gut-churning, but as a picture of the events is painted by diligent public defender Eric Resnick (Chris Messina) and ambitious assistant D.A. Faith Killebrew (Toni Collette) — another sharp, exacting name — Justin quickly realizes that he was at the same bar as Sythe and Kendall that rainy evening. He also recalls hitting something with his SUV in the darkness, right by a deer crossing, which led him to think little of the event at the time. Now, with the facts laid out before him, he isn’t so sure, and with Sythe’s innocence hanging in the balance, his decisions become paramount.

Jonathan Abrams’ screenplay establishes the movie’s premise quickly and with ruthless efficiency. In fact, Justin’s realizations and his acceptance of his role in Kendall’s death unfold rather quickly, to the point that something feels off about the movie’s pacing. However, as Justin tries to convince his fellow jurors to rethink their stances — at first, he’s the only holdout in a sea of guilty verdicts — a surprisingly deft balancing act emerges, wherein the drama of Justin’s remorse, and his dilemmas over how to proceed, become increasingly entwined with the nature of the law itself, and with its in-built presumptions. Granted, the case itself feels legally dubious at times; rare are the moments when it feels like anyone, let alone these specific jurors, might ignore its enormous holes. However, this only makes the movie’s argument more pointed, about what truly informs an individual’s factual reality. 

The “what if?” hanging around Justin’s neck like an albatross isn’t one of whether he was responsible — he’s sure of this up front — but rather, what might happen should he come clean, and what his alternatives to doing so might be. As he seeks legal advice from a lawyer friend, Larry Lasker (Kiefer Sutherland), his conundrum becomes excitingly complicated, paving the way for unexpected personal drama. Not only does Justin have his wife and unborn child to care for, there are also elements of his past — hinted at through dialogue, but eventually revealed through flashbacks and Hoult’s heartrending personal confessions — that would, in theory, cast aspersions on his own character and idyllic façade, a fear made all the more pressing by how sure co-jurors seem of Sythe’s morality.

Justin, therefore, must sway 11 other individuals without tipping his hand. The film becomes a thrilling game of oration and of navigating fiery, idiosyncratic personalities. However, Eastwood never allows his story to become decoupled from larger concerns about the ethics of the law, and to what degree “innocent until proven guilty” truly holds when the accused, the attorneys, the jurors, and even judges don’t exist in vacuum. “To the justice system!” Resnick toasts midway through the film, somewhat tongue-in-cheek. “It isn’t perfect, but it’s the best we’ve got.”

Juror #2 is in a tug-of-war with 12 Angry Men.

Watching Juror #2 in no way requires homework, but familiarity with Lumet’s landmark legal drama (or the teleplay on which it’s based) makes it all the richer. There are, of course, overt plot similarities at the outset. Like Henry Fonda’s upstanding Juror No. 8, Justin is initially the only “non-guilty” voter, while his 11 co-jurors seem convinced otherwise. Although Justin’s motives are deeply personal — he knows the truth, and hopes to alleviate his own guilt — he takes a similar, step-by-step approach to Fonda’s character, asking the group to re-examine the evidence and their own biases before making a life-changing decision.

However, where 12 Angry Men is largely confined to the deliberation room over a single day, Juror #2 spans several days, nights, and locations. While this distinction is merely logistical, what it does with this departure ensures that Eastwood’s spiritual successor soon establishes its own identity. It has a wider purview, not only of the night of the crime — via numerous flashbacks that exhibit minor differences, depending on who’s telling the story — but of the trial itself, and its political entanglements. Killebrew, for instance, is running for District Attorney, and a guilty verdict favors her career.

The departures are mischievous too, from a storytelling standpoint. Several characters, including a retired detective and fellow juror named Harold (J.K. Simmons), begin looking into the case independently, and the question of how close they might come to discovering Justin’s involvement becomes a recurring throughline. However, the film’s thematic expansions prove thorny as well. In updating the make-up of the jury from 12 white men to a mix of men and women of different ethnicities, the film seems to overlook the ensuing racial entanglements, rather than folding them into its story.

None of the jurors are particularly excited to be there — a key starting point, as they (and the audience) are slowly convinced of how important their roles might be — but the two most adamant advocates of a guilty verdict happen to be Marcus (Cedric Yarbrough) and Yolanda (Adrienne C. Moore), the only two Black members of the jury. Not only are they utterly, even viciously convinced of Sythe’s guilt, they also place immense faith in the justice system without question. Yolanda is also afforded little interiority when it comes to her decision-making. While 12 Angry Men never quite got into racial specifics, its stray shot of the accused (John Savoca) and the charged language used by Lee J. Cobb’s hot-headed Juror No. 3 ensured that the specter of racism was ever-present. It is, therefore, more than a little strange that a modern movie set in a Southern U.S. state might not even consider the broader picture of how one’s experiences as a non-white person might differently shape their worldview when it comes to systems of legal justice.

On the plus side, Marcus becomes a greater focus of the film as things play out, so his reasoning feels more justified. But what’s especially interesting about his character is that not only is he the ostensible analogue of Cobb’s adamant third juror in 12 Angry Men, but there’s something distinctly Cobb-esque about him too. The actors could be related for all we know; their eyes are sunken and thoughtful in strikingly similar ways, and Yarbrough layers his temper with nuance and humanity, in the exact same way Cobb was known for doing.

In fact, eyes may be the most important element of Juror #2.

Clint Eastwood paints Juror #2 with subtle, masterful brush strokes.

That the film lays its cards on the table within its first 30 minutes might seem surprising. However, it eschews all elements of mystery for a distinctive purpose. There’s no doubt in Justin’s or the audience’s mind about what actually happened, so the drama is born from the uncertainty of what Justin might do next — and whether it’ll be effective. The factual truth lies in the details, but the film’s emotional truths are just as lucid, and they’re often conveyed through performance. 

Juror #2 may be a wordy film, but its dialogue is seldom expository, other than in scenes recounting the case. Each actor’s posture, their hesitance, and the turning of their mental and moral gears makes their characters’ motives crystal clear, even as the film’s own moral outlook grows murkier and more uncertain. You can tell exactly what a character is thinking just by observing their gaze, from the way they look at other people in the room, to the fleeting moments in which they avert their eyes, thinking silently to themselves. This is part of what makes the movie so enrapturing. The only time this technique is interrupted is when Eastwood and cinematographer Yves Bélanger pull purposefully from film noir, and use blinds and other physical elements to obscure Justin’s eyes in shadow. Uncertainty of plot, and of fact, briefly becomes the same thing as uncertainty of personal truth. 

As the film nears its conclusion, Eastwood sprinkles more moments of doubt along the way, ensuring that anything remotely didactic about Juror #2 swiftly melts away. Hollywood movies about American systems tend to feature a saccharine optimism (à la The Report, which finds hope in the concept of justice even in a film about military torture). However, Juror #2 takes a more cynical bent, if a more realistic one, not only about the ways in which justice can be miscarried, but also the personally driven reasons the U.S. justice system often takes the shape it does.

And yet, Eastwood stresses the vital importance of personal duty within that system without ever getting lost in jingoistic notions. When the jurors feel uncommitted to their roles at first, the filmmaking is noncommittal too, unfolding at an unobtrusive distance and with mechanical proficiency. But as the drama becomes more personal, and more intimate, his aesthetic approach becomes imbued with a ferocious vitality. 

The camera presses in on characters like Justin — and even on Allison, as if to question what, if anything, she knows — practically interrogating them, as it seeks to solve questions that may be unanswerable, in a system rife with imperfections, but one that strives to be “more perfect.” Juror #2 is old-school in its filmmaking, but it embodies a new school of thought for Eastwood, one briefly hinted at in Flags of Our Fathers but clarified with a newfound introspection and vulnerability. Deep-seated symbols and ideas become fluid, making space for captivating drama that both pays homage and paves its own path: a constant tussle between old and new.

Juror #2 opens in theaters Nov. 1.

Read More 

The NYT Strands hints and answers you need to make the most of your puzzling experience.

If you’re reading this, you’re looking for a little help playing Strands, the New York Times‘ elevated word-search game.

Strands requires the player to perform a twist on the classic word search. Words can be made from linked letters — up, down, left, right, or diagonal, but words can also change direction, resulting in quirky shapes and patterns. Every single letter in the grid will be part of an answer. There’s always a theme linking every solution, along with the “spangram,” a special, word or phrase that sums up that day’s theme, and spans the entire grid horizontally or vertically.

By providing an opaque hint and not providing the word list, Strands creates a brain-teasing game that takes a little longer to play than its other games, like Wordle and Connections.

If you’re feeling stuck or just don’t have 10 or more minutes to figure out today’s puzzle, we’ve got all the NYT Strands hints for today’s puzzle you need to progress at your preferred pace.

NYT Strands hint for today’s theme: Strategy game

These words are not checkers-related.

Today’s NYT Strands theme plainly explained

Words that refer to chess pieces and terms. 

NYT Strands spangram hint: Is it vertical or horizontal?

Today’s NYT Strands spangram is vertical.

NYT Strands spangram answer today

Today’s spangram is CheckMate.

NYT Strands word list for November 1

Queen

Knight

Rook

Bishop

Pawn

CheckMate

King

Timer

Board

Looking for other daily online games? Mashable’s Games page has more hints, and if you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now!

Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Strands.

Read More 

Connections is a New York Times word game that’s all about finding the “common threads between words.” How to solve the puzzle.

Connections is the latest New York Times word game that’s captured the public’s attention. The game is all about finding the “common threads between words.” And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we’ve served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle.

If you just want to be told today’s puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for November 1’s Connections solution. But if you’d rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you.

What is Connections?

The NYT‘s latest daily word game has become a social media hit. The Times credits associate puzzle editor Wyna Liu with helping to create the new word game and bringing it to the publications’ Games section. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common.

Tweet may have been deleted

Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there’s only one correct answer.

If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends.

Tweet may have been deleted

Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media.

Here’s a hint for today’s Connections categories

Want a hit about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try:

Yellow: Slow pace

Green: Beers

Blue: Cheesy carbs

Purple: Types of effects

Here are today’s Connections categories

Need a little extra help? Today’s connections fall into the following categories:

Yellow: Progress Slowly

Green: Ways to Order a Beer

Blue: Cheesy Corn Snack Unit

Purple: ___Effect

Looking for Wordle today? Here’s the answer to today’s Wordle.

Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today’s puzzle before we reveal the solutions.

Drumroll, please!

The solution to today’s Connections #509 is…

What is the answer to Connections today

Progress Slowly: CRAWL, CREEP, DRAG, INCH

Ways to Order a Beer: BOTTLE, CAN, DRAFT, TAP

Cheesy Corn Snack Unit: BALL, CURL, DOODLE, PUFF

___Effect: BUTTERFLY, DOMINO, HALO, PLACEBO

Don’t feel down if you didn’t manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we’ll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints.

Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today’s Strands.

If you’re looking for more puzzles, Mashable’s got games now! Check out our games hub for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

Not the day you’re after? Here’s the solution to yesterday’s Connections.

Read More 

Live stream Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League for free from anywhere in the world.

TL;DR: Live stream Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League for free on 10Play. Access this free streaming site from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

Can anyone keep pace with Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League? The defending champions have won every game this season, leaving every other team scrambling to catch up. Al Nassr are third in the standings, but haven’t lost a game this season. Could Cristiano Ronaldo’s team become the first side to beat Al Nassr this season?

If you want to watch Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League for free from anywhere in the world, we have all the information you need.

When is Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal?

Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League kicks off at 2 p.m. ET on Nov. 1. This fixture takes place at the Al-Awwal Park.

How to watch Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal for free

Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League is available to live stream for free on 10Play in Australia.

10Play is geo-restricted to Australia, so you might need to use a VPN to access this free streaming site if you’re traveling abroad during this game. VPNs can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in Australia, meaning you can unblock free live streams of the Saudi Pro League from anywhere in the world.

Access a free live stream of Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal by following these simple steps:

Subscribe to a streaming-friendly VPN (like ExpressVPN)

Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

Open up the app and connect to a server in Australia

Visit 10Play

Live stream Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal for free from anywhere in the world

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but most do offer free-trials or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can watch Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League without actually spending anything. This clearly isn’t a long-term solution, but it does give you enough time to stream select Saudi Pro League fixtures before recovering your investment.

What is the best VPN for 10Play?

ExpressVPN is the best choice for bypassing geo-restrictions to stream live sport on 10Play, for a number of reasons:

Servers in 105 countries including Australia

Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

Strict no-logging policy so your data is secure

Fast connection speeds free from throttling

Up to eight simultaneous connections

30-day money-back guarantee

A one-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $99.95 and includes an extra three months for free — 49% off for a limited time. This plan also includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a generous 30-day money-back guarantee.

Live stream Al Nassr vs. Al Hilal in the Saudi Pro League for free with ExpressVPN.

Read More 

Live stream the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix for free from anywhere in the world.

TL;DR: Watch the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix for free on ServusTV. Access this free streaming platform from anywhere in the world with ExpressVPN.

There are only a couple of MotoGP races left this season, and Jorge Martín is still holding onto that first position in the standings. Everything could change though, because Francesco Bagnaia is still there, waiting for a mistake from his rival.

If you’re interested in watching the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix for free from anywhere in the world, we’ve got all the information you need.

When is the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix?

The MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix takes place at Petronas Sepang International Circuit. The 2024 MotoGP Thailand Grand Prix race starts at 2 a.m. ET on Nov. 3.

How to watch the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix for free

Every MotoGP 2024 race is available to live stream for free on ServusTV.

ServusTV is geo-restricted to Austria, so if you’re traveling outside the country for this race you might need to use a VPN. These tools can hide your real IP address (digital location) and connect you to a secure server in Austria, meaning you can bypass geo-restrictions to access ServusTV from anywhere in the world.

Unblock ServusTV by following this simple process:

Sign up for a VPN (like ExpressVPN)

Download the app to your device of choice (the best VPNs have apps for Windows, Mac, iOS, Android, Linux, and more)

Open up the app and connect to a server in Austria

Connect to ServusTV

Watch MotoGP for free from anywhere in the world

The best VPNs for streaming are not free, but they do tend to offer free-trial periods or money-back guarantees. By leveraging these offers, you can access MotoGP live streams without fully committing with your cash. This clearly isn’t a long-term solution, but it does mean you can watch the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix before recovering your investment.

What is the best VPN for MotoGP?

ExpressVPN is the top choice for unblocking ServusTV, for a number of reasons:

Servers in 105 countries including Austria

Easy-to-use app available on all major devices including iPhone, Android, Windows, Mac, and more

Strict no-logging policy so your data is protected

Fast streaming speeds free from throttling

Up to eight simultaneous connections

30-day money-back guarantee

A one-year subscription to ExpressVPN is on sale for $99.95 and includes an extra three months for free — 49% off for a limited time. This plan also includes a year of free unlimited cloud backup and a 30-day money-back guarantee.

Watch the 2024 MotoGP Malaysia Grand Prix for free with ExpressVPN.

Read More