More From Gurman’s Epic Pre-WWDC Leak Report
More from Gurman’s Friday-before-WWDC report at Bloomberg. But before I start quoting, man, his report reads as though he’s gotten the notes from someone who’s already watched Monday’s keynote. I sort of think that’s what happened, given how much of this no one had reported before today. Bloomberg’s headline even boldly asserts “Here’s Everything Apple Plans to Show at Its AI-Focused WWDC Event”. Don’t follow the link and don’t continue reading this post if you don’t want to see a bunch of spoilers, several of which weren’t even rumors until Gurman dropped this. It’s astonishing how much of what we supposedly know about Apple’s WWDC keynote announcements is entirely from Gurman. If he switched to a different beat we’d be almost entirely in dark; as it stands, he’s seemingly spoiled most of it.
First, he says yes, Apple’s going to do a chatbot, powered by OpenAI:
The company’s new AI system will be called Apple Intelligence, and
it will come to new versions of the iPhone, iPad and Mac operating
systems, according to people familiar with the plans. There also
will be a partnership with OpenAI that powers a ChatGPT-like
chatbot. And the tech giant is preparing to show new software for
the Vision Pro headset, Apple Watch and TV platforms.
A question Gurman’s report doesn’t answer is where this chatbot will be. Is it going to be a new app — a dedicated AI chatbot app? What would that app be called? “Siri”? Or will it live within Spotlight, which a system-level UI you dip in and out of temporarily, not an app? Spotlight works today because you more or less can only ask one thing at a time; a chat app is something with persistence, that you can Command-Tab to and from.
Or would Apple make Siri a persona you can chat with in Messages? I don’t think Apple would put it in Messages, but if they do, will we be able to include it in group chats? That seems like fun on the surface (and it is, in Wavelength) but a privacy problem on deeper thought. When I’m talking to Siri one-on-one I expect Siri to know about me. If Siri were in a group Messages chat it would have be private.
There are a lot of questions even if the answer is that it’s a new standalone app. Will the conversations sync between devices? If so, how does that jibe with on-device processing? If I start a chatbot conversation on my Mac can I continue it on my iPhone? How does that work if the conversation on pertains to files or data that’s only on my Mac? On-device processing raises questions that don’t exist with cloud-only processing.
One feature that will likely get a lot of attention among Gen
Z — and perhaps the rest of the population — will be
AI-created emoji. This will use AI to create custom emoji
characters on the fly that represent phrases or words as
they’re being typed. That means there will be many more
options than the ones in the standardized emoji library that
has long been built into the iPhone.
Will this be like Memoji — a feature of Messages — not the OS? I’m guessing yes. So you won’t be able to send these emoji through, say, WhatsApp, Signal, or even email. It kind of makes sense. To be cross-platform it either needs to be part of the Unicode spec (which isn’t even possible for on-the-fly custom emoji) or would have be rendered as an image attachment. And we can paste whatever images we want anywhere we want already. What makes emoji (and Memoji) special is that you don’t treat them like images, you treat them like text.
The Messages app is getting some non-AI tweaks, including a change
to the effects feature — the thing that lets you send fireworks
and other visual elements to the people you’re texting. Users will
now be able to trigger an effect with individual words, rather
than the entire message. There will be new colorful icons for
Tapbacks, which let you quickly respond to a message with a heart,
exclamation point or other character (they’re currently gray). And
users will have the ability to Tapback a message with any emoji.
There’s another frequently requested feature coming as well: the
ability to schedule a message to be sent later.
Not sure what the difference is between “colorful Tapbacks” and “Tapback a message with any emoji”, but this one gets a legit finally.
Safari in macOS 15, codenamed Glow, is getting some changes, but
it seems unlikely that Apple is going to unveil its own ad blocker — something that’s been reported as a possibility. Advertisers
already pushed back heavily against Apple’s App Tracking
Transparency, or ATT, in iOS 14 a few years ago, and the company
doesn’t need another privacy-related headache.
Built-in ad blocking in Safari wouldn’t be a privacy headache; blocking ads can only increase privacy. It would be an antitrust/regulatory headache. The argument from ATT opponents is that it steers advertisers toward purchasing ads in the App Store, where the ATT rules don’t apply. Apple doesn’t track what users do within apps, of course — which is the legitimate privacy issue ATT attempts to address — but as the operator of the App Store, it does know which apps a user owns and uses. So Apple can, say, recommend game C because you play games A and B, even if A, B, and C all come from different developers.
★
More from Gurman’s Friday-before-WWDC report at Bloomberg. But before I start quoting, man, his report reads as though he’s gotten the notes from someone who’s already watched Monday’s keynote. I sort of think that’s what happened, given how much of this no one had reported before today. Bloomberg’s headline even boldly asserts “Here’s Everything Apple Plans to Show at Its AI-Focused WWDC Event”. Don’t follow the link and don’t continue reading this post if you don’t want to see a bunch of spoilers, several of which weren’t even rumors until Gurman dropped this. It’s astonishing how much of what we supposedly know about Apple’s WWDC keynote announcements is entirely from Gurman. If he switched to a different beat we’d be almost entirely in dark; as it stands, he’s seemingly spoiled most of it.
First, he says yes, Apple’s going to do a chatbot, powered by OpenAI:
The company’s new AI system will be called Apple Intelligence, and
it will come to new versions of the iPhone, iPad and Mac operating
systems, according to people familiar with the plans. There also
will be a partnership with OpenAI that powers a ChatGPT-like
chatbot. And the tech giant is preparing to show new software for
the Vision Pro headset, Apple Watch and TV platforms.
A question Gurman’s report doesn’t answer is where this chatbot will be. Is it going to be a new app — a dedicated AI chatbot app? What would that app be called? “Siri”? Or will it live within Spotlight, which a system-level UI you dip in and out of temporarily, not an app? Spotlight works today because you more or less can only ask one thing at a time; a chat app is something with persistence, that you can Command-Tab to and from.
Or would Apple make Siri a persona you can chat with in Messages? I don’t think Apple would put it in Messages, but if they do, will we be able to include it in group chats? That seems like fun on the surface (and it is, in Wavelength) but a privacy problem on deeper thought. When I’m talking to Siri one-on-one I expect Siri to know about me. If Siri were in a group Messages chat it would have be private.
There are a lot of questions even if the answer is that it’s a new standalone app. Will the conversations sync between devices? If so, how does that jibe with on-device processing? If I start a chatbot conversation on my Mac can I continue it on my iPhone? How does that work if the conversation on pertains to files or data that’s only on my Mac? On-device processing raises questions that don’t exist with cloud-only processing.
One feature that will likely get a lot of attention among Gen
Z — and perhaps the rest of the population — will be
AI-created emoji. This will use AI to create custom emoji
characters on the fly that represent phrases or words as
they’re being typed. That means there will be many more
options than the ones in the standardized emoji library that
has long been built into the iPhone.
Will this be like Memoji — a feature of Messages — not the OS? I’m guessing yes. So you won’t be able to send these emoji through, say, WhatsApp, Signal, or even email. It kind of makes sense. To be cross-platform it either needs to be part of the Unicode spec (which isn’t even possible for on-the-fly custom emoji) or would have be rendered as an image attachment. And we can paste whatever images we want anywhere we want already. What makes emoji (and Memoji) special is that you don’t treat them like images, you treat them like text.
The Messages app is getting some non-AI tweaks, including a change
to the effects feature — the thing that lets you send fireworks
and other visual elements to the people you’re texting. Users will
now be able to trigger an effect with individual words, rather
than the entire message. There will be new colorful icons for
Tapbacks, which let you quickly respond to a message with a heart,
exclamation point or other character (they’re currently gray). And
users will have the ability to Tapback a message with any emoji.
There’s another frequently requested feature coming as well: the
ability to schedule a message to be sent later.
Not sure what the difference is between “colorful Tapbacks” and “Tapback a message with any emoji”, but this one gets a legit finally.
Safari in macOS 15, codenamed Glow, is getting some changes, but
it seems unlikely that Apple is going to unveil its own ad blocker — something that’s been reported as a possibility. Advertisers
already pushed back heavily against Apple’s App Tracking
Transparency, or ATT, in iOS 14 a few years ago, and the company
doesn’t need another privacy-related headache.
Built-in ad blocking in Safari wouldn’t be a privacy headache; blocking ads can only increase privacy. It would be an antitrust/regulatory headache. The argument from ATT opponents is that it steers advertisers toward purchasing ads in the App Store, where the ATT rules don’t apply. Apple doesn’t track what users do within apps, of course — which is the legitimate privacy issue ATT attempts to address — but as the operator of the App Store, it does know which apps a user owns and uses. So Apple can, say, recommend game C because you play games A and B, even if A, B, and C all come from different developers.