California’s Governor Just Vetoed Its Controversial AI Bill
“California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed SB 1047, a high-profile bill that would have regulated the development of AI,” reports TechCrunch.
The bill “would have made companies that develop AI models liable for implementing safety protocols to prevent ‘critical harms’.”
The rules would only have applied to models that cost at least $100 million and use 10^26 FLOPS (floating point operations, a measure of computation) during training.
SB 1047 was opposed by many in Silicon Valley, including companies like OpenAI, high-profile technologists like Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, and even Democratic politicians such as U.S. Congressman Ro Khanna. That said, the bill had also been amended based on suggestions by AI company Anthropic and other opponents.
In a statement about today’s veto, Newsom said, “While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the..” bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”
“Over the past 30 days, Governor Newsom signed 17 bills covering the deployment and regulation of GenAI technology…” according to a statement from the governor’s office, “cracking down on deepfakes, requiring AI watermarking, protecting children and workers, and combating AI-generated misinformation… The Newsom Administration will also immediately engage academia to convene labor stakeholders and the private sector to explore approaches to use GenAI technology in the workplace.”
In a separate statement the governor pointed out California ” is home to 32 of the world’s 50 leading Al companies,” and warned that the bill “could give the public a false sense of security about controlling this fast-moving technology. Smaller, specialized models may emerge as equally or even more dangerous than the models targeted by SB 1047 — at the potential expense of curtailing the very innovation that fuels advancement in favor of the public good…”
“While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it.
“I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
“California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed SB 1047, a high-profile bill that would have regulated the development of AI,” reports TechCrunch.
The bill “would have made companies that develop AI models liable for implementing safety protocols to prevent ‘critical harms’.”
The rules would only have applied to models that cost at least $100 million and use 10^26 FLOPS (floating point operations, a measure of computation) during training.
SB 1047 was opposed by many in Silicon Valley, including companies like OpenAI, high-profile technologists like Meta’s chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, and even Democratic politicians such as U.S. Congressman Ro Khanna. That said, the bill had also been amended based on suggestions by AI company Anthropic and other opponents.
In a statement about today’s veto, Newsom said, “While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the..” bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it. I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”
“Over the past 30 days, Governor Newsom signed 17 bills covering the deployment and regulation of GenAI technology…” according to a statement from the governor’s office, “cracking down on deepfakes, requiring AI watermarking, protecting children and workers, and combating AI-generated misinformation… The Newsom Administration will also immediately engage academia to convene labor stakeholders and the private sector to explore approaches to use GenAI technology in the workplace.”
In a separate statement the governor pointed out California ” is home to 32 of the world’s 50 leading Al companies,” and warned that the bill “could give the public a false sense of security about controlling this fast-moving technology. Smaller, specialized models may emerge as equally or even more dangerous than the models targeted by SB 1047 — at the potential expense of curtailing the very innovation that fuels advancement in favor of the public good…”
“While well-intentioned, SB 1047 does not take into account whether an AI system is deployed in high-risk environments, involves critical decision-making or the use of sensitive data. Instead, the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions — so long as a large system deploys it.
“I do not believe this is the best approach to protecting the public from real threats posed by the technology.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.