Apple Set to Collect $73 Million in Legal Fees From Epic Games
Apple, a court filing spotted by Florian Mueller at Games Fray:
Please take notice that on March 5, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Court, at the
courtroom of the Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, […] Apple
Inc. (“Apple”) will and hereby does move that this Court, pursuant
to the mandate of the Ninth Circuit, enter judgment ordering Epic
Games, Inc. (“Epic”) to pay Apple $73,404,326, plus additional
amounts Apple is incurring during this ongoing litigation, under
the indemnification provision of the Developer Program License
Agreement.
This is not simply about Epic having sued Apple and lost; it’s about the fact that this whole saga started with Epic’s Fortnite in-app payment processing stunt, blatantly violating the Developer Program License Agreement. This wasn’t like an edge case or technicality; Epic deliberately violated the clear rules of the DPLA as a publicity stunt to launch their antitrust lawsuit. File under “Fucking Around and Finding Out”.
Mueller writes:
Early into the litigation, Epic accepted that if it loses on its
antitrust claims (as it did), it owes damages. If Epic had
prevailed on antitrust, the contract clause wouldn’t have been
enforceable. […]
Apple does this as a matter of principle. They won’t leave an
amount in the tens of millions on the table. And their overall
treatment of Epic, such as not putting Fortnite back, is meant to
discourage other app makers from challenging Apple and from
breaching the DPLA.
It’s unsurprising but worth noting that Fortnite is seemingly never coming back to iOS, unless Epic sells the franchise to another company. iOS Fortnite players are like the children in an ugly divorce.
★
Apple, a court filing spotted by Florian Mueller at Games Fray:
Please take notice that on March 5, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., or as soon
thereafter as the matter may be heard by the Court, at the
courtroom of the Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, […] Apple
Inc. (“Apple”) will and hereby does move that this Court, pursuant
to the mandate of the Ninth Circuit, enter judgment ordering Epic
Games, Inc. (“Epic”) to pay Apple $73,404,326, plus additional
amounts Apple is incurring during this ongoing litigation, under
the indemnification provision of the Developer Program License
Agreement.
This is not simply about Epic having sued Apple and lost; it’s about the fact that this whole saga started with Epic’s Fortnite in-app payment processing stunt, blatantly violating the Developer Program License Agreement. This wasn’t like an edge case or technicality; Epic deliberately violated the clear rules of the DPLA as a publicity stunt to launch their antitrust lawsuit. File under “Fucking Around and Finding Out”.
Mueller writes:
Early into the litigation, Epic accepted that if it loses on its
antitrust claims (as it did), it owes damages. If Epic had
prevailed on antitrust, the contract clause wouldn’t have been
enforceable. […]
Apple does this as a matter of principle. They won’t leave an
amount in the tens of millions on the table. And their overall
treatment of Epic, such as not putting Fortnite back, is meant to
discourage other app makers from challenging Apple and from
breaching the DPLA.
It’s unsurprising but worth noting that Fortnite is seemingly never coming back to iOS, unless Epic sells the franchise to another company. iOS Fortnite players are like the children in an ugly divorce.