Month: August 2024

La Liga Soccer Livestream: How to Watch Barcelona vs. Real Valladolid From Anywhere

Hansi Flick’s side aiming to maintain their perfect start to the season as they host the Pucela.

Hansi Flick’s side aiming to maintain their perfect start to the season as they host the Pucela.

Read More 

How to Make Your iPhone Last Longer video

Here are some steps you can take to maximize the longevity of your iPhone.

Here are some steps you can take to maximize the longevity of your iPhone.

Read More 

Best Facial Recognition Security Cameras for 2024

Take a look at the facial recognition security cameras we’ve tested recently and see which models are the best for your home.

Take a look at the facial recognition security cameras we’ve tested recently and see which models are the best for your home.

Read More 

How Star Wars walked away from the world’s first self-retracting lightsaber toy

Goliath’s Power Saber, in red and green. | Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge

It would have been a Star Wars product — but Hasbro whiffed. Hasbro turned down the holy grail of lightsaber toys, and it won’t say why.
The Star Wars toymaker spent two years secretly working on a kids lightsaber that can automatically extend and retract its blade — the very first of its kind. Hasbro acquired all rights to the idea from a previously unknown Israeli inventor and patented it around the world.
But instead of finishing the product, Hasbro walked away without explanation. It let the inventor claw back the rights. Today, with the help of a different manufacturer, you can finally buy it at Target and Walmart — as the Goliath Power Saber.
The $60 toy doesn’t have official Star Wars sounds or authentic Jedi or Sith hilts. The blade isn’t as long as the movie sabers, and it doesn’t have the build quality or sophistication of pricier props.

But a simple yet ingenious mechanism means we finally have a lightsaber toy that can actually retract its own blade. Slide the golden switch, and a noisy motor sends each of its glowing blade segments smoothly in and out of the handle. Poke someone with the saber, and its blade will safely collapse without damage. You can even safely point it at your own face — see that in my video below.
Three years after Disney jazzed the world with a self-retracting lightsaber prop that you’ll never get to touch, one that was exclusively used by a paid actor in its shuttered $6,000-per-stay Star Wars hotel, you can now buy a toy that captures some of the same magic.
And its Israeli inventor claims that the Power Saber is just the start.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Verge (@verge)

Yair Shilo tells The Verge it took five years just to figure out the right formula for a safely collapsing automatic blade, starting with prototypes made of paper and tin foil. He says he sold newspapers, trimmed lawns, and cleaned swimming pools while he worked on his Star Wars childhood dream, eventually rallying a cousin and an investment group behind a provisional patent in 2019.
Fundamentally, the new Power Saber isn’t that complicated inside. Just like the kiddie saber I proudly carried to the premiere of Star Wars: Episode I in 1999, the blade consists of telescoping tubes that stick together when fully extended. With those kiddie sabers, you flick your arm to propel the whole set of tubes; with the Power Saber, each segment is pushed upward and pulled downward by a long screw.

Image: USPTO
The screw raises each segment in turn. The actual product functions almost identically to these patent images — I opened one up to check.

But that’s not the clever part. The simple genius of Shilo’s patent is that each blade segment isn’t married to that screw, so you can safely collapse them without sticking a screw into your hand. As the saber extends, each segment lifts up off the screw, carried into the air by the segment behind it. Once the tip of the saber extends far enough, it pulls the next blade segment up into the air, and the next, and the next, until they’re all fully extended, held together by friction alone.
And, each blade segment has flexible tabs where they meet the smooth screw, letting them slip down their track when you apply pressure. Even if you roughly shove the whole blade back into its casing — which I’ve done plenty of times in tests — it doesn’t hurt or damage the internal mechanism, claims Shilo.

Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge
The screw is clearly visible through the transparent lightsaber shell — if you look down.

That’s something its inventor says other designs never cracked. “99 percent of them, something needs to push the smallest segment from inside,” he says. “With this mechanism, nothing pushes it.” Hasbro tried for years, says Nextoy founder Robert Fuhrer, and it did create spring-loaded auto-extending blades, but there were always potential safety issues when auto-retracting a toy lightsaber’s blade. Shilo ran into some of them himself with an earlier model that relied on traditional gears.
The “biggest toy ever”?
But Shilo didn’t just want to build an auto-retractable blade; he wanted to build an official Star Wars lightsaber with Hasbro, the company with Disney’s exclusive blessing to mass-produce genuine Star Wars toys. “He was asking around the toy industry if anybody was tied up with Hasbro and knew them well,” recalls Fuhrer, who successfully connected him to the company and remains his agent today.
In 2020, Shilo shipped Hasbro a wooden wine box containing a white plastic prototype with a red motorized blade. He says Hasbro was more than happy — they told him he’d finally cracked the code. They told him it’d be the “biggest toy ever.”
Two years later, it fell apart.
“They say to us, hey bye bye, we’re not going to do it, we have a problem inside, we have a lot of things going on, you need to go,” says Shilo.

No one’s willing to tell The Verge what actually happened. Shilo, Fuhrer, even Power Saber manufacturer Goliath all suggest they want to maintain a positive relationship with Hasbro instead of speaking out of turn.
Hasbro won’t say, either. “We greatly value our partnerships with inventors who bring us their ideas for toys and games. For a variety of reasons, we were unable to move forward with this particular concept,” reads a statement from Hasbro senior publicity manager Whitney Spencer to The Verge.

Fuhrer strongly suggested I speak to Angus Walker, Hasbro’s head of inventor relations, but the company declined to make him available for an interview.
It makes me wonder: could there still be some fundamental issue with the design? (I did note that sometimes the saber’s tip falls in after a handful of whacks.) But Fuhrer says no, Hasbro didn’t cite any specific concerns. “There was no hard reason,” he says. “There was nothing like ‘there’s a safety issue’ or a cost issue or anything like that.”
He also downplays the possibility that Hasbro might sue over the patent. “I don’t think there’s any feeling of animosity,” says Fuhrer.
He speculates that Hasbro was just under a lot of pressure at the time. Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner had just died; it was the early pandemic; some projects fell by the wayside. Cost might have been a factor, too: he says Target and Walmart were pressuring toy companies to keep the price under $50. And, he says, an early prototype did fail one of Hasbro’s very early safety tests.
But he points to Goliath’s successfully shipping $60 saber at Target and Walmart as proof that neither cost nor safety were sticking points — and says Hasbro is going to regret missing out because the Power Saber will cannibalize their toy sales.

Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge

We were able to figure out why Hasbro would give the idea back to Shilo and his investors: Hasbro was contractually obligated to return the rights if it didn’t move forward, Fuhrer confirms. So they found a new partner in Goliath instead, a company previously mostly known for its board games, and the “Power Saber” was born.
I would’ve been blown away by this toy as a kid, but I wouldn’t have been completely satisfied by its knockoff feeling — and I gather Shilo might feel the same way. Earlier in our conversation, he’d spoken about the Star Wars lightsaber almost religiously, about how it’s “the only weapon that brings light to the world,” how he always wanted to be a Jedi, and how building a lightsaber was a childhood dream. How important is that official Star Wars part to him now, I ask?
He says that like the Force, he believes his lightsaber will eventually find his way to Star Wars. He says it’s meant to be.

Goliath’s Power Saber, in red and green. | Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge

It would have been a Star Wars product — but Hasbro whiffed.

Hasbro turned down the holy grail of lightsaber toys, and it won’t say why.

The Star Wars toymaker spent two years secretly working on a kids lightsaber that can automatically extend and retract its blade — the very first of its kind. Hasbro acquired all rights to the idea from a previously unknown Israeli inventor and patented it around the world.

But instead of finishing the product, Hasbro walked away without explanation. It let the inventor claw back the rights. Today, with the help of a different manufacturer, you can finally buy it at Target and Walmart — as the Goliath Power Saber.

The $60 toy doesn’t have official Star Wars sounds or authentic Jedi or Sith hilts. The blade isn’t as long as the movie sabers, and it doesn’t have the build quality or sophistication of pricier props.

But a simple yet ingenious mechanism means we finally have a lightsaber toy that can actually retract its own blade. Slide the golden switch, and a noisy motor sends each of its glowing blade segments smoothly in and out of the handle. Poke someone with the saber, and its blade will safely collapse without damage. You can even safely point it at your own face — see that in my video below.

Three years after Disney jazzed the world with a self-retracting lightsaber prop that you’ll never get to touch, one that was exclusively used by a paid actor in its shuttered $6,000-per-stay Star Wars hotel, you can now buy a toy that captures some of the same magic.

And its Israeli inventor claims that the Power Saber is just the start.

Yair Shilo tells The Verge it took five years just to figure out the right formula for a safely collapsing automatic blade, starting with prototypes made of paper and tin foil. He says he sold newspapers, trimmed lawns, and cleaned swimming pools while he worked on his Star Wars childhood dream, eventually rallying a cousin and an investment group behind a provisional patent in 2019.

Fundamentally, the new Power Saber isn’t that complicated inside. Just like the kiddie saber I proudly carried to the premiere of Star Wars: Episode I in 1999, the blade consists of telescoping tubes that stick together when fully extended. With those kiddie sabers, you flick your arm to propel the whole set of tubes; with the Power Saber, each segment is pushed upward and pulled downward by a long screw.

Image: USPTO
The screw raises each segment in turn. The actual product functions almost identically to these patent images — I opened one up to check.

But that’s not the clever part. The simple genius of Shilo’s patent is that each blade segment isn’t married to that screw, so you can safely collapse them without sticking a screw into your hand. As the saber extends, each segment lifts up off the screw, carried into the air by the segment behind it. Once the tip of the saber extends far enough, it pulls the next blade segment up into the air, and the next, and the next, until they’re all fully extended, held together by friction alone.

And, each blade segment has flexible tabs where they meet the smooth screw, letting them slip down their track when you apply pressure. Even if you roughly shove the whole blade back into its casing — which I’ve done plenty of times in tests — it doesn’t hurt or damage the internal mechanism, claims Shilo.

Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge
The screw is clearly visible through the transparent lightsaber shell — if you look down.

That’s something its inventor says other designs never cracked. “99 percent of them, something needs to push the smallest segment from inside,” he says. “With this mechanism, nothing pushes it.” Hasbro tried for years, says Nextoy founder Robert Fuhrer, and it did create spring-loaded auto-extending blades, but there were always potential safety issues when auto-retracting a toy lightsaber’s blade. Shilo ran into some of them himself with an earlier model that relied on traditional gears.

The “biggest toy ever”?

But Shilo didn’t just want to build an auto-retractable blade; he wanted to build an official Star Wars lightsaber with Hasbro, the company with Disney’s exclusive blessing to mass-produce genuine Star Wars toys. “He was asking around the toy industry if anybody was tied up with Hasbro and knew them well,” recalls Fuhrer, who successfully connected him to the company and remains his agent today.

In 2020, Shilo shipped Hasbro a wooden wine box containing a white plastic prototype with a red motorized blade. He says Hasbro was more than happy — they told him he’d finally cracked the code. They told him it’d be the “biggest toy ever.”

Two years later, it fell apart.

“They say to us, hey bye bye, we’re not going to do it, we have a problem inside, we have a lot of things going on, you need to go,” says Shilo.

No one’s willing to tell The Verge what actually happened. Shilo, Fuhrer, even Power Saber manufacturer Goliath all suggest they want to maintain a positive relationship with Hasbro instead of speaking out of turn.

Hasbro won’t say, either. “We greatly value our partnerships with inventors who bring us their ideas for toys and games. For a variety of reasons, we were unable to move forward with this particular concept,” reads a statement from Hasbro senior publicity manager Whitney Spencer to The Verge.

Fuhrer strongly suggested I speak to Angus Walker, Hasbro’s head of inventor relations, but the company declined to make him available for an interview.

It makes me wonder: could there still be some fundamental issue with the design? (I did note that sometimes the saber’s tip falls in after a handful of whacks.) But Fuhrer says no, Hasbro didn’t cite any specific concerns. “There was no hard reason,” he says. “There was nothing like ‘there’s a safety issue’ or a cost issue or anything like that.”

He also downplays the possibility that Hasbro might sue over the patent. “I don’t think there’s any feeling of animosity,” says Fuhrer.

He speculates that Hasbro was just under a lot of pressure at the time. Hasbro CEO Brian Goldner had just died; it was the early pandemic; some projects fell by the wayside. Cost might have been a factor, too: he says Target and Walmart were pressuring toy companies to keep the price under $50. And, he says, an early prototype did fail one of Hasbro’s very early safety tests.

But he points to Goliath’s successfully shipping $60 saber at Target and Walmart as proof that neither cost nor safety were sticking points — and says Hasbro is going to regret missing out because the Power Saber will cannibalize their toy sales.

Photo by Sean Hollister / The Verge

We were able to figure out why Hasbro would give the idea back to Shilo and his investors: Hasbro was contractually obligated to return the rights if it didn’t move forward, Fuhrer confirms. So they found a new partner in Goliath instead, a company previously mostly known for its board games, and the “Power Saber” was born.

I would’ve been blown away by this toy as a kid, but I wouldn’t have been completely satisfied by its knockoff feeling — and I gather Shilo might feel the same way. Earlier in our conversation, he’d spoken about the Star Wars lightsaber almost religiously, about how it’s “the only weapon that brings light to the world,” how he always wanted to be a Jedi, and how building a lightsaber was a childhood dream. How important is that official Star Wars part to him now, I ask?

He says that like the Force, he believes his lightsaber will eventually find his way to Star Wars. He says it’s meant to be.

Read More 

IT admin charged with extorting employer by locking down hundreds of workstations

Ransomware attackers don’t always have to be outsiders, sometimes they can be employees.

Ransomware threat actors don’t always have to come from outside the victim organization – take Daniel Rhyne, a 57-year-old man from Kansas City, Missouri, who is being charged with locking down, and trying to extort, his own employer.

Allegedly, late last year, Rhyne was working at an industrial company in Somerset County, New Jersey. One day in November, he reset passwords to all network administrator accounts, as well as hundreds of user accounts. He deleted all backups, and locked users out of hundreds of servers, and thousands of workstations. Roughly an hour later, he mailed everyone to notify them of the attack, and to demand a ransom in exchange for re-establishing access.

These claims are being made by the FBI, who investigated the attack, and later charged the man with one count of extortion in relation to a threat to cause damage to a protected computer, one count of intentional damage to a protected computer, and one count of wire fraud.

TheFr0zenCrew!

Cumulatively, should he be convicted on all charges, Rhyne could be facing up to 35 years in jail, and a fine of $500,000, The Register reports.

The FBI shared a few details to back its claims. For example, Rhyne used Windows’ net user and Sysinternals Utilities’ PsPasswd tool to change people’s passwords to “TheFr0zenCrew!”. Furthermore, he kept a hidden virtual machine on his company-issued laptop, which he used to remotely access an admin account. This account had the same password – TheFr0zenCrew!.

Also, he used his company-issued laptop to search for a few damning things, such as “command line to change password,” “command line to change local administrator password,” and “command line to remotely change local administrator password.”

Finally, he was seen coming to work, logging into his laptop, doing the searches, and then looking at company password spreadsheets, while at the same time accessing the hidden VM.

Via The Register

More from TechRadar Pro

This clever new ransomware is targeting your Google Chrome data, so be on your guardHere’s a list of the best firewall software around todayThese are the best endpoint security tools right now

Read More 

New iPhone 16 Pro leak shows how the new gold titanium color might look

Gold is apparently making a comeback with the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max models.

There’s just a week and a bit to go until Apple unveils the iPhone 16 series, and a newly leaked image gives us an idea of the gold titanium color that’s rumored to be coming to the Pro and Pro Max models this year.

The image was shared by 9to5Mac and created by an inside source who has been accurate with information in the past. The picture shows the back of an iPhone 16 Pro in a case, and we can also see a cut out for the new Capture button we’re expecting to see.

Several previous rumors have hinted at this new color, though there’s been some debate about exactly what shade of gold it’s going to be, and the official name Apple is going to use for it: gold? Brown? Bronze? Desert?

It will be a single word followed by Titanium to match the other colors, and here 9to5Mac goes with gold. It’s set to replace the Blue Titanium option we saw with the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max, which launched in 2023.

Going for gold… again

The September 9 Apple event invitation (Image credit: Future/Jacob Krol)

If this gold shade does show up on the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max, then it would actually be an old color returning – gold has been available each year on at least some iPhone models since the iPhone XS in 2018, with the exception of the iPhone 15 series.

So the four colors we’re expecting for the Pro and Pro Max in 2024 are these: Natural (or Gray) Titanium, White Titanium, Black Titanium, and Desert Titanium (remember titanium was introduced as a material on the Pro-level iPhones last year).

However, nothing is certain until Apple CEO Tim Cook is telling us what the colors are in another polished video presentation – we’ve also heard rumors of a rose color, as well as plenty of leaks around the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Plus shades.

All will be revealed on Monday, September 9, and of course we’ll be covering the whole event live – you can also watch along online. As well as the iPhone 16 models, we should also see the Apple Watch 10, the Apple Watch Ultra 3, and the AirPods 4.

You might also like

Here’s when iPhone 16 preorders could get startedThe iPhone 16 Pro could give buyers an easier choiceWe think the iPhone 16 should offer better battery life

Read More 

Your IT department may one day control whether you can view your laptop screen or not — remote display permission features could become reality for business, for better or worse

Rain Technology develops an innovative way to stop people snooping on your screen.

Working from an office can be complicated at the best of things, and things look set to get more so with a new tool aimed at protecting screens from unwanted eyeballs of all kinds.

Laptop Switchable Privacy from Rain Technology is aimed at so-called Tier 1 manufacturers like Apple, Dell, HP, Huawei and Lenovo, and looks to protect screens against hackers and people snooping, especially in vulnerable settings like cafes, planes, trains, subways and taxis. 

Of course, LSP also works within the office and at home – Rain Technology is targeting enterprise IT departments, which would gain the ability to effectively control who can see a laptop’s display and who can’t, all with the click of a button (or a few buttons). 

Beyond software security 

The company says its tool is available with a Share Mode and a Privacy Mode to set the angle and degree of privacy, depending on the specific needs of the customer. 

“Manufacturers who utilize this technology will be providing the highest level of device data security on the market, building strong brand affinity and fostering trust and loyalty,” explained Rain Technology CEO Robert Ramsey. 

“This is a winning proposition for both enterprises and consumers that prioritizes security and privacy and also benefits laptop, tablet and monitor manufacturers by providing differentiated, best-in-class security for their customers.”

(Image credit: Shutterstock)

A lot of the focus of enterprise IT departments goes to software security – and rightly so, especially as phishing emails and other types of hacks become more common. But there is another side to things: the actual physical device. 

In recent years, we’ve seen Google and other companies share physical hardware keys to help with online log-ins and to ensure that people are who they say they are. And in some ways, Laptop Switchable Privacy is an extension of that mindset. 

The company says that when a laptop screen is “secured”, the only thing a potential hacker or snooper can see is metallic, black, or feature Display Screen Branding, which Rain Technology describes as an etched logo design. 

In terms of the tech powering LSP, Rain says it holds the patent for “creating a thin, embedded proprietary layer within the liquid crystal module of a display screen”, meaning that it goes beyond simply adding a software layer to laptops. At its peak, there can be as little as 0.3% screen visibility from a 45° viewing angle. 

Rain says LSP is compatible with standard LCD displays, and plans to soon support OLED, Micro-LED and Nano-LED displays. 

MORE FROM TECHRADAR PRO

We tested the best antivirus software around todayHere are the best ways to protect your new laptopWant to stay safe online? Try the best internet security suites

Read More 

Should you buy a Bluetooth turntable? The advantages and disadvantages explained

The good and the bad of wireless Bluetooth streaming for your favorite records.

Bluetooth turntables have been getting more and more common over the last few years, so you might be wondering if it’s a good idea to buy one. For a very long time, there have been two kinds of turntable. The first kind is the all-in-one, the record player that comes in a single unit that also contains an amplifier and speakers. And the second, much more common kind is the turntable you connect to other hi-fi hardware. 

Until very recently that connection was made with a wire, but a growing number of manufacturers now offer wireless turntables that connect over Bluetooth, or adapters that enable you to make a wired turntable into a Bluetooth one – and several of the best turntables offer this option.

That opens up some interesting possibilities. Getting rid of wires is always appealing – I’ve just moved home and put off setting up my audio gear for ages because I was in no hurry to spend hours running cables over, under and through things – but Bluetooth turntables can also stream directly to the best Bluetooth speakers or the best wireless headphones. But is that a good idea, or is cable still the conqueror of connections? Let’s find out.

Bluetooth vs wired turntables: what’s the difference?

All turntables work in the same way: the record spins and a stylus follows the patterns in its grooves, turning those patterns into an electrical signal. But what happens to that signal differs between wired and Bluetooth turntables. With a traditional wired turntable, the signal is sent to the audio outputs of the turntable, which are in turn connected to a phono stage to boost the signal, and then to an amplifier. The amplifier then increases the signal strength further and sends it to your speakers or headphones.

With a Bluetooth turntable, the audio signal is passed on to a Bluetooth transmitter, which broadcasts the signal to another Bluetooth device. And doing that means it needs to process the signal, which we’ll look at in more detail shortly.

This Bluetooth turntable can pair with these Bluetooth speakers for a setup where no cables need to be hidden. (Image credit: Audio-Technica)

Bluetooth vs wired turntables: convenience

On the face of it, Bluetooth is vastly more convenient: no cables! Smart speakers! But in order for Bluetooth to work, you need to “pair” your devices – which is when the device that’s transmitting says hello to the device that’s going to be receiving. And while that should work effortlessly and flawlessly, it doesn’t always: if you have a particular Bluetooth speaker or headphones in mind, it’s wise to Google whether there are any pairing issues with your potential new turntable, because there can be annoying and often mysterious incompatibilities. Pairing can also be annoying if you have multiple Bluetooth devices in the same room, or a regular irritation if you also use your speakers or headphones with other audio sources.

Another issue with Bluetooth, one that you may have encountered with headphones or earbuds, is sometimes the signal stutters or drops altogether. That doesn’t happen with wires but it can happen even with quite expensive Bluetooth turntables, since there’s the potential for intereference.

Bluetooth vs wired turntables: cost

Although adding Bluetooth to a turntable means more components and complexity that doesn’t necessarily translate to a higher-priced turntable: you can get very cheap Bluetooth turntables as well as frighteningly expensive ones. 

But with all other components being equal, a Bluetooth turntable will be slightly more expensive – and the better the circuitry, the more expensive it’s likely to be.

The Cambridge Audio Alva TT is a high-end piece of gear – so does Bluetooth do it justice? (Image credit: Cambridge Audio)

Bluetooth vs wired turntables: sound

I’ve left the biggest one till last, because it’s the most important one for some listeners. Bluetooth can’t deliver music without losing some of the information that’s on the original record.

Does that matter? That very much depends on your hardware and your priorities. If you’re not listening on high-end hardware, or if you don’t mind sacrificing a little sound quality for a lot of convenience, then it doesn’t matter at all. And the differences are small unless you’ve got really good hearing and really good hardware too.

But nevertheless it’s true that there is a trade-off between wireless convenience and sound quality. There are two reasons for that. The first is that your turntable’s signal is analog, but Bluetooth’s is digital. I’m absolutely not going to get dragged down into the analog vs digital argument that’s been raging for decades now, but many people believe analog sounds better – or, at least, preferable.

The second reason is more objective: Bluetooth is lossy, which means that some of the original musical information is removed before the audio reaches your ears. That’s because there is a limit to how much data Bluetooth can stream, so when the original audio signal is converted, it is also compressed to make it fit the available bandwidth. 

The tool that decides what to keep and what to cut is called a codec, which is short for encoder/decoder. And the codec your turntable and speakers or headphones support will have a big influence on what you hear. That’s because while all the main codecs convert and compress the audio information, some of them do it more efficiently and more pleasingly than others.

This topic can get very technical and very dull very quickly, so here’s the key information: SBC is the most widely supported codec and sounds pretty good (it’s the standard for Bluetooth headphones) but isn’t as good as more recent codecs; aptX is better, and aptX HD and aptX Adaptive are better still but aren’t so widely supported. If you’re into Sony kit it’s likely to support LDAC, Sony’s own codec, which is a good alternative to aptX if your hardware supports it.

The Audio-Technica LP70XBT could be ideal for beginners. (Image credit: Audio-Technica)

Bluetooth vs wired turntables: which should you buy?

If convenience is your priority, or you want to listen on Bluetooth headphones, then Bluetooth is likely to make you happiest. If you’re serious about sound quality, wired will usually be better. But why choose at all? 

If you’re starting from scratch you don’t have to pick one or the other: you can get a turntable that offers the best of the wired and wireless worlds, and there are great options at most price points. 

For example our current best budget buy, the Audio-Technica AT-LP60XBT (and there’s a new version, called the Audio-Technica AT-LP70XBT) – has Bluetooth with aptX as well as wired connections for an amp (including its own phono stage, which you can switch off if you don’t need it). It’s a similar story with many more premium turntables (such as the Cambridge Audio Alva TT v2) where you’ll typically pay a little more for wireless connectivity but you benefit from more playback options.

Read More 

Scroll to top
Generated by Feedzy