Month: April 2024

Illustration: The Verge

A software engineer who was fired from Google in connection to internal protests at the company’s offices says the company retaliated against him for merely watching the demonstration against an Israeli defense contract.
The former employee, who asked to remain anonymous, said he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to check out the protest.
“When I got there, there were probably 20-ish people sitting on the floor. I didn’t talk to any of them, I talked to folks who were standing up, passing out flyers, doing other roles,” he said, adding that the protesters were wearing matching T-shirts.

The worker then went back to his desk before returning to the protest around 5PM. “I chatted with them for maybe four minutes, like, ‘Oh my gosh, you’re still sitting here! How’s it going?’” he said. Then, he finished the workday from a nearby couch. The worker says he returned to Google the following day without incident. That night, while at dinner, he got an email from Google saying he had been terminated.
“I think it’s all part of this bigger context of Google cracking down on workers having a voice,” said the former employee, who worked at Google for almost three years and was part of the Alphabet Workers Union leadership. (The Alphabet Workers Union is a non-contract union, meaning it hasn’t been recognized by the NLRB.)
Google initially put nine employees on administrative leave for occupying its offices in New York City and Sunnyvale, California, in protest of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with the Israeli government. Those workers were also arrested. The company then fired 28 employees in connection with the protests. In an internal memo to staff, Chris Rackow, Google’s head of global security, said the company would take further action if needed.
“The overwhelming majority of our employees do the right thing,” Rackow’s statement read. “If you’re one of the few who are tempted to think we’re going to overlook conduct that violates our policies, think again. The company takes this extremely seriously, and we will continue to apply our longstanding policies to take action against disruptive behavior — up to and including termination.”
Less than a week later, Google fired more than 20 other employees, some of whom said they hadn’t participated in the protests at all.
In a statement to The Verge, Google spokesperson Bailey Tomson said the company investigated the “physical disruption inside our buildings on April 16, looking at additional details provided by coworkers who were physically disrupted” to determine which workers had been involved.”
But the software engineer who was fired says he was never contacted by HR or asked whether he had actually been involved in the protests. “They didn’t even reach out to me,” he said. “This was a total shock; I had no hint that this was coming.”
The software engineer who was fired says he was never contacted by HR or asked whether he had actually been involved in the protests
The worker said that while he was watching the protest, a security guard approached him and others in the lounge and asked to see their Google badges to make sure there were no outside participants. “It didn’t even occur to me that I shouldn’t show him my badge. He’s the security guard in the place that I work, and I was doing nothing wrong,” the worker said.
More than 50 workers who were fired by Google in connection with protests over the company’s ties to the Israeli government filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board on Monday. The workers have alleged unlawful retaliation and are asking for their jobs back, according to an emailed statement from No Tech For Apartheid, the group that organized the protests.
Google “retaliated against approximately 50 employees and interfered with their Section 7 rights by terminating and/or placing them on administrative leave in response to their protected concerted activity, namely, participation (or perceived participation) in a peaceful, non-disruptive protest that was directly and explicitly connected to their terms and conditions of work,” the complaint reads.
Jane Chung, a spokesperson for No Tech For Apartheid, previously told The Verge that the firings included “non-participating bystanders.” Google disputes this. Tomson, the Google spokesperson, told The Verge that all of the workers who were fired were “personally and definitively involved in disruptive activity inside our buildings.”
This is a marked departure from the way Google has handled employee dissent in the past. In 2018, more than 600 Google workers signed an open letter opposing Project Dragonfly, an effort to build a search engine for China. As The Verge reported at the time, the petition began with an internally shared Google Doc, and all subsequent steps were also organized using Google products. Employees also urged Google to drop Project Maven, its contract with the US Department of Defense. That same year, over 20,000 Google employees staged a walkout in protest of the company’s handling of sexual harassment allegations against executives.
Meredith Whittaker, a program manager at Google who helped organize the 2018 walkout, left the company in 2019 of her own volition. In 2019, workers also held a sit-in protesting alleged retaliation against their colleagues who had spoken out.
“There’s been a total change in the way Google responds to employees trying to have a voice in their workplace,” the fired software engineer said. “It’s night and day from the Google of even five, 10 years ago.”

Illustration: The Verge

A software engineer who was fired from Google in connection to internal protests at the company’s offices says the company retaliated against him for merely watching the demonstration against an Israeli defense contract.

The former employee, who asked to remain anonymous, said he went to the lounge on the 10th floor of Google’s New York City office around lunchtime to check out the protest.

“When I got there, there were probably 20-ish people sitting on the floor. I didn’t talk to any of them, I talked to folks who were standing up, passing out flyers, doing other roles,” he said, adding that the protesters were wearing matching T-shirts.

The worker then went back to his desk before returning to the protest around 5PM. “I chatted with them for maybe four minutes, like, ‘Oh my gosh, you’re still sitting here! How’s it going?’” he said. Then, he finished the workday from a nearby couch. The worker says he returned to Google the following day without incident. That night, while at dinner, he got an email from Google saying he had been terminated.

“I think it’s all part of this bigger context of Google cracking down on workers having a voice,” said the former employee, who worked at Google for almost three years and was part of the Alphabet Workers Union leadership. (The Alphabet Workers Union is a non-contract union, meaning it hasn’t been recognized by the NLRB.)

Google initially put nine employees on administrative leave for occupying its offices in New York City and Sunnyvale, California, in protest of Project Nimbus, a $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with the Israeli government. Those workers were also arrested. The company then fired 28 employees in connection with the protests. In an internal memo to staff, Chris Rackow, Google’s head of global security, said the company would take further action if needed.

“The overwhelming majority of our employees do the right thing,” Rackow’s statement read. “If you’re one of the few who are tempted to think we’re going to overlook conduct that violates our policies, think again. The company takes this extremely seriously, and we will continue to apply our longstanding policies to take action against disruptive behavior — up to and including termination.”

Less than a week later, Google fired more than 20 other employees, some of whom said they hadn’t participated in the protests at all.

In a statement to The Verge, Google spokesperson Bailey Tomson said the company investigated the “physical disruption inside our buildings on April 16, looking at additional details provided by coworkers who were physically disrupted” to determine which workers had been involved.”

But the software engineer who was fired says he was never contacted by HR or asked whether he had actually been involved in the protests. “They didn’t even reach out to me,” he said. “This was a total shock; I had no hint that this was coming.”

The worker said that while he was watching the protest, a security guard approached him and others in the lounge and asked to see their Google badges to make sure there were no outside participants. “It didn’t even occur to me that I shouldn’t show him my badge. He’s the security guard in the place that I work, and I was doing nothing wrong,” the worker said.

More than 50 workers who were fired by Google in connection with protests over the company’s ties to the Israeli government filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board on Monday. The workers have alleged unlawful retaliation and are asking for their jobs back, according to an emailed statement from No Tech For Apartheid, the group that organized the protests.

Google “retaliated against approximately 50 employees and interfered with their Section 7 rights by terminating and/or placing them on administrative leave in response to their protected concerted activity, namely, participation (or perceived participation) in a peaceful, non-disruptive protest that was directly and explicitly connected to their terms and conditions of work,” the complaint reads.

Jane Chung, a spokesperson for No Tech For Apartheid, previously told The Verge that the firings included “non-participating bystanders.” Google disputes this. Tomson, the Google spokesperson, told The Verge that all of the workers who were fired were “personally and definitively involved in disruptive activity inside our buildings.”

This is a marked departure from the way Google has handled employee dissent in the past. In 2018, more than 600 Google workers signed an open letter opposing Project Dragonfly, an effort to build a search engine for China. As The Verge reported at the time, the petition began with an internally shared Google Doc, and all subsequent steps were also organized using Google products. Employees also urged Google to drop Project Maven, its contract with the US Department of Defense. That same year, over 20,000 Google employees staged a walkout in protest of the company’s handling of sexual harassment allegations against executives.

Meredith Whittaker, a program manager at Google who helped organize the 2018 walkout, left the company in 2019 of her own volition. In 2019, workers also held a sit-in protesting alleged retaliation against their colleagues who had spoken out.

“There’s been a total change in the way Google responds to employees trying to have a voice in their workplace,” the fired software engineer said. “It’s night and day from the Google of even five, 10 years ago.”

Read More 

Photo: Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Tesla was on the cusp of taking over electric vehicle charging in the US — then, the layoffs came.
Today, multiple outlets reported that the company has laid off hundreds of employees, just weeks after cutting 10 percent (approximately 14,000 people) of its global workforce. Tesla’s Supercharger division was said to be particularly hard hit, with several soon-to-be-former employees saying that close to the entire team had been cut.
According to The Information, Rebecca Tinucci, Tesla’s senior director of EV charging, is leaving the company, alongside most of the 500-person team she oversaw. Tinucci oversaw the effort to win near universal support from other automakers for Tesla’s North American Charging Standard (NACS), an enormous feat that earned her a spot on the “TIME100 Climate” list and MotorTrend’s “Power List,” as noted by Electrek.
Tesla’s Supercharger division was said to be particularly hard hit
Things started rolling in November 2022, when Tesla announced that it was opening up its EV charging plug and network to other automakers. The idea was to give the rest of the industry access to Tesla’s more reliable Supercharger stations at a time when EV charging is a dicey and precarious proposition — while also enabling the company to access billions of dollars in federal funding for future charging infrastructure.
Ford came first, then GM, and then everyone else. Most recently, two global automakers, Volkswagen Group and Stellantis, were the latest — and last — to say they would adopt Tesla’s charging standard for their future EVs.
Tesla’s decision to lay off nearly its entire Supercharger team at its moment of triumph could signal a shift in strategy. For example, Electrek also reported that the company was pulling out of four leases for new charging stations in the New York City area. But those who were affected by today’s cuts said they were blindsided by the news.

Confirmed – @Tesla @elonmusk has let our entire charging org go. What this means for the charging network, NACS, and all the exciting work we were doing across the industry, I don’t yet know. What a wild ride it has been.— willjameson (@willjameson) April 30, 2024

“Wow, this is real. I can’t confirm 100% that the entire #TeslaCharging org has been laid off, but my team and I certainly have been,” William Navarro Jameson, strategic charging programs lead, wrote on his LinkedIn profile. “As I try to piece together anything more I will share what I can.”
Jameson later wrote on X that “@elonmusk has let our entire charging org go,” adding that the layoffs present “a unique opportunity for the industry to capitalize on the newly available talent and expertise in the space.”
“If Tesla is yielding the charging crown,” he added, “who will step up?”
George Bahadue, senior manager of site acquisition and business development for Tesla’s commercial charging program, also said on LinkedIn that he had been laid off. “To the Supercharger team, this is not the end, it is the start of a new chapter,” he wrote.
“If Tesla is yielding the charging crown, who will step up?”
Tesla’s Supercharger network is widely recognized as superior to many of the third-party EV charging stations, most of which feature CCS plugs and the less-utilized CHAdeMO charging standard. The company says it has 45,000 Superchargers worldwide, 12,000 of which are located in the US.
In its most recent earnings report, Tesla said it installed 6,249 Supercharger stations, which include 57,579 connectors, during the first three months of 2024. Station installations were up 26 percent year over year, while the number of connectors was up 27 percent. It was a rare area of growth for the company, which has seen its sales and profits fall since last year as demand for EVs cools down.
EV charging remains a sore point for the entire industry, with numerous surveys citing consumer anxiety about the state of charging in the US. With better, more reliable charging, many have theorized that EV adoption would improve significantly.
During that earnings call, Elon Musk paid short shrift to Tesla’s automotive business, preferring to aggressively tout the company’s newfound status as an AI venture and promote its efforts to produce a fully autonomous robotaxi. The future is bright, he insisted, because Tesla is going to “solve autonomy.”
The number of times EV charging or Tesla’s Superchargers came up during the one-hour call? Zero.

Photo: Genaro Molina / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Tesla was on the cusp of taking over electric vehicle charging in the US — then, the layoffs came.

Today, multiple outlets reported that the company has laid off hundreds of employees, just weeks after cutting 10 percent (approximately 14,000 people) of its global workforce. Tesla’s Supercharger division was said to be particularly hard hit, with several soon-to-be-former employees saying that close to the entire team had been cut.

According to The Information, Rebecca Tinucci, Tesla’s senior director of EV charging, is leaving the company, alongside most of the 500-person team she oversaw. Tinucci oversaw the effort to win near universal support from other automakers for Tesla’s North American Charging Standard (NACS), an enormous feat that earned her a spot on the “TIME100 Climate” list and MotorTrend’s “Power List,” as noted by Electrek.

Things started rolling in November 2022, when Tesla announced that it was opening up its EV charging plug and network to other automakers. The idea was to give the rest of the industry access to Tesla’s more reliable Supercharger stations at a time when EV charging is a dicey and precarious proposition — while also enabling the company to access billions of dollars in federal funding for future charging infrastructure.

Ford came first, then GM, and then everyone else. Most recently, two global automakers, Volkswagen Group and Stellantis, were the latest — and last — to say they would adopt Tesla’s charging standard for their future EVs.

Tesla’s decision to lay off nearly its entire Supercharger team at its moment of triumph could signal a shift in strategy. For example, Electrek also reported that the company was pulling out of four leases for new charging stations in the New York City area. But those who were affected by today’s cuts said they were blindsided by the news.

“Wow, this is real. I can’t confirm 100% that the entire #TeslaCharging org has been laid off, but my team and I certainly have been,” William Navarro Jameson, strategic charging programs lead, wrote on his LinkedIn profile. “As I try to piece together anything more I will share what I can.”

Jameson later wrote on X that “@elonmusk has let our entire charging org go,” adding that the layoffs present “a unique opportunity for the industry to capitalize on the newly available talent and expertise in the space.”

“If Tesla is yielding the charging crown,” he added, “who will step up?”

George Bahadue, senior manager of site acquisition and business development for Tesla’s commercial charging program, also said on LinkedIn that he had been laid off. “To the Supercharger team, this is not the end, it is the start of a new chapter,” he wrote.

Tesla’s Supercharger network is widely recognized as superior to many of the third-party EV charging stations, most of which feature CCS plugs and the less-utilized CHAdeMO charging standard. The company says it has 45,000 Superchargers worldwide, 12,000 of which are located in the US.

In its most recent earnings report, Tesla said it installed 6,249 Supercharger stations, which include 57,579 connectors, during the first three months of 2024. Station installations were up 26 percent year over year, while the number of connectors was up 27 percent. It was a rare area of growth for the company, which has seen its sales and profits fall since last year as demand for EVs cools down.

EV charging remains a sore point for the entire industry, with numerous surveys citing consumer anxiety about the state of charging in the US. With better, more reliable charging, many have theorized that EV adoption would improve significantly.

During that earnings call, Elon Musk paid short shrift to Tesla’s automotive business, preferring to aggressively tout the company’s newfound status as an AI venture and promote its efforts to produce a fully autonomous robotaxi. The future is bright, he insisted, because Tesla is going to “solve autonomy.”

The number of times EV charging or Tesla’s Superchargers came up during the one-hour call? Zero.

Read More