Month: July 2023

“NASA took a significant step Tuesday toward allowing humans on the moon to ‘live off the land,'” reports the Washington Post.
NASA awarded several contracts “to build landing pads, roads and habitats on the lunar surface, use nuclear power for energy, and even lay a high-voltage power line over half a mile…”

Instead of going to the moon and returning home, as was done during the Apollo era of the 1960s and early ’70s, NASA intends to build a sustainable presence focusing on the lunar South Pole, where there is water in the form of ice. The contracts awarded Tuesday are some of the first steps the agency is taking toward developing the technologies that would allow humans to live for extended periods of time on the moon and in deep space. Materials on the moon must be used to extract the necessities such as water, fuel and metal for construction, said Prasun Desai, NASA’s acting associate administrator for space technology. “We’re trying to start that technology development to make that a reality in the future,” he said.

The largest award, $34.7 million, went to billionaire Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin space venture, which has been working on a project since 2021 called Blue Alchemist to build solar cells and transmission wire out of the moon’s regolith — rocks and dirt. In a blog post this year, Blue Origin said it developed a reactor that reaches temperatures of nearly 3,000 degrees and uses an electrical current to separate iron, silicon and aluminum from oxygen in the regolith. The testing, using a lunar regolith simulant, has created silicon pure enough to make solar cells to be used on the lunar surface, the company said. [NASA says it could also be used to make wires.] The oxygen could be used for humans to breathe. “To make long-term presence on the moon viable, we need abundant electrical power,” the company wrote in the post. “We can make power systems on the moon directly from materials that exist everywhere on the surface, without special substances brought from Earth.”
The award is another indication that Blue Origin is trying to position itself as a key player in helping NASA build a permanent presence on and around the moon as part of the Artemis program… The company said it is developing a solar-powered storage tank to keep propellants at 20 degrees Kelvin, or about minus-423 degrees Fahrenheit, so spacecraft can refuel in space instead of returning to Earth between missions.
Other winners cited in the article:

Zeno Power, which “intends to use nuclear energy to provide power on the moon,” received a $15 million contract (partnering with Blue Origin).
Astrobotic — which plans to launch a lander to the moon this year — got a $34.6 million contract “to build a power line that would transmit electricity from a lunar lander’s solar arrays to a rover. It ultimately intends to build a larger power source using solar arrays on the moon’s surface.”
Redwire won a $12.9 million contract “to help build roads and landing pads on the moon. It would use a microwave emitter to melt the regolith and transform treacherous rocky landscapes into smooth, solid surfaces, said Mike Gold, Redwire’s chief growth officer.”

The technologies — which include in-space 3D printing — “will expand industry capabilities for a sustained human presence on the Moon,” NASA said in a statement.

The U.S. space agency will contribute a total of $150 million, with each company contributing at least 10-25% of the total cost (based on their size). “Partnering with the commercial space industry lets us at NASA harness the strength of American innovation and ingenuity,” said NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. “The technologies that NASA is investing in today have the potential to be the foundation of future exploration.”

“Our partnerships with industry could be a cornerstone of humanity’s return to the Moon under Artemis,” said acting associate administrator Desai. “By creating new opportunities for streamlined awards, we hope to push crucial technologies over the finish line so they can be used in future missions.

“These innovative partnerships will help advance capabilities that will enable sustainable exploration on the Moon.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

“NASA took a significant step Tuesday toward allowing humans on the moon to ‘live off the land,'” reports the Washington Post.
NASA awarded several contracts “to build landing pads, roads and habitats on the lunar surface, use nuclear power for energy, and even lay a high-voltage power line over half a mile…”

Instead of going to the moon and returning home, as was done during the Apollo era of the 1960s and early ’70s, NASA intends to build a sustainable presence focusing on the lunar South Pole, where there is water in the form of ice. The contracts awarded Tuesday are some of the first steps the agency is taking toward developing the technologies that would allow humans to live for extended periods of time on the moon and in deep space. Materials on the moon must be used to extract the necessities such as water, fuel and metal for construction, said Prasun Desai, NASA’s acting associate administrator for space technology. “We’re trying to start that technology development to make that a reality in the future,” he said.

The largest award, $34.7 million, went to billionaire Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin space venture, which has been working on a project since 2021 called Blue Alchemist to build solar cells and transmission wire out of the moon’s regolith — rocks and dirt. In a blog post this year, Blue Origin said it developed a reactor that reaches temperatures of nearly 3,000 degrees and uses an electrical current to separate iron, silicon and aluminum from oxygen in the regolith. The testing, using a lunar regolith simulant, has created silicon pure enough to make solar cells to be used on the lunar surface, the company said. [NASA says it could also be used to make wires.] The oxygen could be used for humans to breathe. “To make long-term presence on the moon viable, we need abundant electrical power,” the company wrote in the post. “We can make power systems on the moon directly from materials that exist everywhere on the surface, without special substances brought from Earth.”
The award is another indication that Blue Origin is trying to position itself as a key player in helping NASA build a permanent presence on and around the moon as part of the Artemis program… The company said it is developing a solar-powered storage tank to keep propellants at 20 degrees Kelvin, or about minus-423 degrees Fahrenheit, so spacecraft can refuel in space instead of returning to Earth between missions.
Other winners cited in the article:

Zeno Power, which “intends to use nuclear energy to provide power on the moon,” received a $15 million contract (partnering with Blue Origin).
Astrobotic — which plans to launch a lander to the moon this year — got a $34.6 million contract “to build a power line that would transmit electricity from a lunar lander’s solar arrays to a rover. It ultimately intends to build a larger power source using solar arrays on the moon’s surface.”
Redwire won a $12.9 million contract “to help build roads and landing pads on the moon. It would use a microwave emitter to melt the regolith and transform treacherous rocky landscapes into smooth, solid surfaces, said Mike Gold, Redwire’s chief growth officer.”

The technologies — which include in-space 3D printing — “will expand industry capabilities for a sustained human presence on the Moon,” NASA said in a statement.

The U.S. space agency will contribute a total of $150 million, with each company contributing at least 10-25% of the total cost (based on their size). “Partnering with the commercial space industry lets us at NASA harness the strength of American innovation and ingenuity,” said NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. “The technologies that NASA is investing in today have the potential to be the foundation of future exploration.”

“Our partnerships with industry could be a cornerstone of humanity’s return to the Moon under Artemis,” said acting associate administrator Desai. “By creating new opportunities for streamlined awards, we hope to push crucial technologies over the finish line so they can be used in future missions.

“These innovative partnerships will help advance capabilities that will enable sustainable exploration on the Moon.”

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read More 

After Red Hat’s decision to only share RHEL source code with subscribers, AlmaLinux asked their bug report submitters to “attempt to test and replicate the problem in CentOS Stream as well, so we can focus our energy on correcting it in the right place.”

Red Hat told Ars Technica they are “eager to collaborate” on their CentOS Stream distro, “even if we ultimately compete in a business sense. Differentiated competition is a sign of a healthy ecosystem.”

But Red Hat still managed to ruffled some feathers, reports ZDNet:
AlmaLinux Infrastructure Team Leader Jonathan Wright recently posted a CentOS Stream fix for CVE-2023-38403, a memory overflow problem in iperf3. Iperf3 is a popular open-source network performance test. This security hole is an important one, but not a huge problem.

Still, it’s better by far to fix it than let it linger and see it eventually used to crash a server. That’s what I and others felt anyway. But, then, a senior Red Hat software engineer replied, “Thanks for the contribution. At this time, we don’t plan to address this in RHEL, but we will keep it open for evaluation based on customer feedback.”

That went over like a lead balloon.
The GitLab conversation proceeded:

AlmaLinux: “Is customer demand really necessary to fix CVEs?”

Red Hat: “We commit to addressing Red Hat defined Critical and Important security issues. Security vulnerabilities with Low or Moderate severity will be addressed on demand when [a] customer or other business requirements exist to do so.”

AlmaLinux: “I can even understand that, but why reject the fix when the work is already done and just has to be merged?”
At this point, Mike McGrath, Red Hat’s VP of Core Platforms, AKA RHEL, stepped in. He explained, “We should probably create a ‘what to expect when you’re submitting’ doc. Getting the code written is only the first step in what Red Hat does with it. We’d have to make sure there aren’t regressions, QA, etc. … So thank you for the contribution, it looks like the Fedora side of it is going well, so it’ll end up in RHEL at some point.”

Things went downhill rapidly from there…

On Reddit, McGrath said, “I will admit that we did have a great opportunity for a good-faith gesture towards Alma here and fumbled.”
Finally, though the Red Hat Product Security team rated the CVE as “‘Important,’ the patch was merged.

Coincidentally, last month AlmaLinux announced that its move away from 1:1 compatibility with RHEL meant “we can now accept bug fixes outside of Red Hat’s release cycle.”

This Thursday AlmaLinux also reiterated that they’re “fully committed to delivering the best possible experience for the community, no matter where or what you run.” And in an apparent move to beef up compatibility testing, they announced they’d be bringing openQA to the RHEL ecosystem. (They describe openQA as a tool using virtual machines that “simplifies automated testing of the whole installation process of an operating system in a wide combination of software and hardware configurations.”)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

After Red Hat’s decision to only share RHEL source code with subscribers, AlmaLinux asked their bug report submitters to “attempt to test and replicate the problem in CentOS Stream as well, so we can focus our energy on correcting it in the right place.”

Red Hat told Ars Technica they are “eager to collaborate” on their CentOS Stream distro, “even if we ultimately compete in a business sense. Differentiated competition is a sign of a healthy ecosystem.”

But Red Hat still managed to ruffled some feathers, reports ZDNet:
AlmaLinux Infrastructure Team Leader Jonathan Wright recently posted a CentOS Stream fix for CVE-2023-38403, a memory overflow problem in iperf3. Iperf3 is a popular open-source network performance test. This security hole is an important one, but not a huge problem.

Still, it’s better by far to fix it than let it linger and see it eventually used to crash a server. That’s what I and others felt anyway. But, then, a senior Red Hat software engineer replied, “Thanks for the contribution. At this time, we don’t plan to address this in RHEL, but we will keep it open for evaluation based on customer feedback.”

That went over like a lead balloon.
The GitLab conversation proceeded:

AlmaLinux: “Is customer demand really necessary to fix CVEs?”

Red Hat: “We commit to addressing Red Hat defined Critical and Important security issues. Security vulnerabilities with Low or Moderate severity will be addressed on demand when [a] customer or other business requirements exist to do so.”

AlmaLinux: “I can even understand that, but why reject the fix when the work is already done and just has to be merged?”
At this point, Mike McGrath, Red Hat’s VP of Core Platforms, AKA RHEL, stepped in. He explained, “We should probably create a ‘what to expect when you’re submitting’ doc. Getting the code written is only the first step in what Red Hat does with it. We’d have to make sure there aren’t regressions, QA, etc. … So thank you for the contribution, it looks like the Fedora side of it is going well, so it’ll end up in RHEL at some point.”

Things went downhill rapidly from there…

On Reddit, McGrath said, “I will admit that we did have a great opportunity for a good-faith gesture towards Alma here and fumbled.”
Finally, though the Red Hat Product Security team rated the CVE as “‘Important,’ the patch was merged.

Coincidentally, last month AlmaLinux announced that its move away from 1:1 compatibility with RHEL meant “we can now accept bug fixes outside of Red Hat’s release cycle.”

This Thursday AlmaLinux also reiterated that they’re “fully committed to delivering the best possible experience for the community, no matter where or what you run.” And in an apparent move to beef up compatibility testing, they announced they’d be bringing openQA to the RHEL ecosystem. (They describe openQA as a tool using virtual machines that “simplifies automated testing of the whole installation process of an operating system in a wide combination of software and hardware configurations.”)

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read More